2015
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Evaluation of Digital Rectal Examination for Assessment of Anal Tone in Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome

Abstract: 4.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 In a model simulating AT, only 64% of AT assessments were correct. 12 PAS and AT are not the most sensitive signs of sacral nerve root injury. The assessment of anal squeeze (AS) may be more accurate than AT.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 11 In a model simulating AT, only 64% of AT assessments were correct. 12 PAS and AT are not the most sensitive signs of sacral nerve root injury. The assessment of anal squeeze (AS) may be more accurate than AT.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The assessment of anal squeeze (AS) may be more accurate than AT. 12 The bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) is rarely tested in CES, but an absent BCR has a high correlation with MRI+. 1 Even though a single sign has a poor correlation with MRI+, combinations of signs are more accurate.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DRE performs poorly compared with objective measures of anal tone in both simulation [27] and clinical studies [28]. Reduced anal squeeze has also been proposed as a late sign [29], which would limit its value for early detection of CES.…”
Section: Physical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced anal tone was recorded in 23 (22%) of the 106 patients with CES in the three studies,347 and normal anal tone was recorded in 35 (33%) of those with CES. Other studies of anal tone assessments in clinical circumstances and using model simulations have shown poor levels of sensitivity, specificity, and internal agreement 1213…”
Section: How Is It Diagnosed?mentioning
confidence: 99%