The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill

Modrcin, Matthew J.; Rapp, Charles A.; Poertner, John

doi:10.1016/0149-7189(88)90043-2

Cited by 101 publications

(73 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although none of the evaluation studies formally investigated the impact of strengths assessment on the SAMHSA's National Outcome Measure Domains (NOMs), a number of the domains were included in the research. For example, within the context of SBCM, the SAW was shown to improve retention and uptake of drug programs (Havens et al, 2007), improved educational outcomes (Modcrin, Rapp & Poertner, 1988) and reduced hospitalization (Macias et al, 1994), whereas the VIA-IS was demonstrated to impact on client perception of care (Resnick & Rosenheck, 2006) and remission rates (Seligman, Rashid & Parks, 2006). An important area of future work will be to assess the impact of strengths assessments within routine care in respect to the NOMs domains.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Political including rights and advocacy Modcrin, Rapp & Poertner (1988) RCT with 4 months follow up N=89 individuals referred to a mental health centre of which 44 were included in the analysis.…”

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…10 studies assessing strengths case management (Barry et al, 2003;Havens et al, 2007;Kisthardt, 1993;Macias et al, 1994;Modrcin et al 1988;Rapp & Chamberlain, 1985;Ryan et al, 1994;Stanard, 1999;Macias et al, 1997;Rapp & Wintersteen, 1989) 2. Strengths Assessment Worksheetspirituality (Eichler et al, 2006) Clinician administered semi-structured interview expanding on the spirituality section of the Strengths Assessment Worksheet.…”

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assessing the strengths of mental health consumers: A systematic review.

Bird¹,

Boutillier²,

Leamy³

et al. 2012

Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strengths assessments focus on the individual's talents, abilities, resources, and strengths. No systematic review of strengths assessments for use within mental health populations has been published. The aims of this study were to describe and evaluate strengths assessments for use within mental health services. A systematic review identified 12 strengths assessments (5 quantitative, 7 qualitative). The Strengths Assessment Worksheet (SAW) was the most widely utilized and evaluated qualitative assessment. Psychometric properties of the assessments were assessed against set quality criteria. Data on psychometric properties were available for 4 measures. The Client Assessment of Strengths, Interests and Goals (CASIG) had the strongest psychometric evidence. The SAW and CASIG assessments can be tentatively recommended within clinical practice, although the evidence for all strengths assessments is currently limited. To describe the content of the strengths assessment, the items used to operationalize the concept of strengths in each assessment were extracted and themed. Twenty-four themes were identified and organized into 3 overarching categories: individual factors, environmental factors, and interpersonal factors. These categories form the basis of an empirically based definition of strengths that could be used as a conceptual foundation for new clinical assessments. Strengths assessments focus on the individual's talents, abilities, resources and strengths.No systematic review of strengths assessments for use within mental health populations has been published. The aims of this study were to describe and evaluate strengths assessments for use within mental health services. A systematic review identified 12 strengths assessments (five quantitative, seven qualitative). The Strengths Assessment Worksheet (SAW) was the most widely utilized and evaluated qualitative assessment.Psychometric properties of the assessments were assessed against set quality criteria. Data on psychometric properties were available for four measures. The Client Assessment of Strengths, Interests and Goals (CASIG) had the strongest psychometric evidence. The SAW and CASIG assessments can be tentatively recommended within clinical practice, although the evidence for all strengths assessments is currently limited. To describe the content of the strengths assessment, the items used to operationalize the concept of

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing the strengths of mental health consumers: A systematic review.

Bird¹,

Boutillier²,

Leamy³

et al. 2012

Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Quatre études expérimentales (Modcrin et al, 1988 ;Chamberlain, 1991 ;Macias et al, 1994 ;Björkman et al, 2002) et quatre quasi expérimentales (Rapp et Chamberlain, 1985 ;Rapp et Wintersteen, 1989 ;Kisthardt, 1993 ;Macias et al, 1997 ;Stanard, 1999) évaluent des programmes associés au modèle des forces. Les quatre études expéri mentales mesurent l'effet sur les admis sions, sur des indicateurs de qualité de vie et de fonctionnement : deux notent une réduction des hospitalisations et deux aucune différence.…”

Section: Modèle Des Forcesunclassified

Soutien d’intensité variable (SIV) et rétablissement : que nous apprennent les études expérimentales et quasi expérimentales ?

Latimer

Rabouin

2011

smq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Les écrits sur les recherches utilisant un modèle de planification misant sur les forces de la personne, modèle conçu à l'École de bienêtre social de l'Université du Kansas, au Missouri, démontrent que son utilisation favorise le rendement au travail, améliore la vie quotidienne (Modrcin et al, 1988) et augmente le temps passé en communauté. Le modèle mettant l'accent sur la réadaptation, conçu par le Center for Psychiatrie Rehabilitation de l'Université de Boston, semble favoriser une meilleure utilisation du temps disponible chez les sujets vivant en rési-dence (Goering et al, 1988).…”

unclassified