2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00555.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Euroscan study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection rates during pregnancy were similar for public and nonpublic hospitals, whereas cases were diagnosed earlier in patients from nonpublic hospitals. 40.3444/2004-7 and 40.1467/2004-0 [1][2][3][4][5] This rate varies widely among countries according to the availability of sonography and the use of prenatal screening as well as the individual parental decision to continue a pregnancy. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection rates during pregnancy were similar for public and nonpublic hospitals, whereas cases were diagnosed earlier in patients from nonpublic hospitals. 40.3444/2004-7 and 40.1467/2004-0 [1][2][3][4][5] This rate varies widely among countries according to the availability of sonography and the use of prenatal screening as well as the individual parental decision to continue a pregnancy. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prenatal US rate was 89% in Hawaii and 91% in Europe. The slightly lower prenatal US rate in Hawaii could be because Hawaii does not have a policy of offering prenatal US to all pregnant women, whereas many countries in Europe do (Clementi and Stoll, 2001). The differences may also be due to differences in economic and/or cultural factors, which may play a part in the recommendation of prenatal diagnostic procedures by healthcare providers or their utilization by pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A recent investigation reported such rates for birth defects registries in Europe (Garne et al, 2004). However, prenatal US is offered to all pregnant women in many European countries (Clementi and Stoll, 2001). This may not be the case in the United States, a nation without a unified national health care system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Esta tasa es menor a las reportadas en otros estudios (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Si se evalúa por anomalía específica, hubo baja detección de anomalías con gran compromiso de la anatomía, como lo son espina bífida, defectos de la pared abdominal, cardiopatía congénita, hernia diafragmática y, labio y paladar hendidos, entre otros.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified