The European Union and Democratization
DOI: 10.4324/9780203458464_chapter_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The European Union, democratization, and minorities in Latvia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Latvia , the Russians who accounted for just under 30 per cent of the population dominated minority politics. Despite more liberal language and citizenship laws passed in the late 1990s under strong pressure from the OSCE and EU (Muižnieks and Brands Kehris, 2003), disputes persisted over the high proportion of non‐citizens and the relative slowness of the naturalization process. Moreover, minority politics was caught up in party‐political polemics.…”
Section: Slovakia and Latvia: Conditionality Issues Since Eu Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Latvia , the Russians who accounted for just under 30 per cent of the population dominated minority politics. Despite more liberal language and citizenship laws passed in the late 1990s under strong pressure from the OSCE and EU (Muižnieks and Brands Kehris, 2003), disputes persisted over the high proportion of non‐citizens and the relative slowness of the naturalization process. Moreover, minority politics was caught up in party‐political polemics.…”
Section: Slovakia and Latvia: Conditionality Issues Since Eu Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was a gamble, insofar as ministries can be reorganised, liquidated, or combined with every change in the political wind. However, I reckoned that once a government structure devoted to the minority issue had been created, the threshold for destroying it would immediately be relatively high: international attention to the minority issue in Latvia had been intense (see, e.g., Birckenbach, 1997;Dorodnova, 2003;Muiznieks and Brands Kehris, 2003) and no Latvian government could credibly claim that the issue had been resolved once and for all. I calculated that I could raise that threshold even more by activating some typical bureaucratic logic.…”
Section: Experiences In Government: the Logic Of Bureaucraciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These years were characterized by intensified interaction between this outside pressure, marked by regular diplomatic visits and repeated monitoring of the minority situation, and a rather complicated domestic state of affairs with moves and counter-moves among the divided political elite in Riga. Among other things, there was a referendum on the new citizenship law instigated by the nationalist party while, on the language law, the new President Vīķe-Freiberga played a vital part in forcing through change by veto just in time for the EU decision on negotiations (Muižnieks & Brands Kehris 2003). Clearly, this short period marked a turning point both in Latvia's EU fortunes and in its conditionality compliance; but, given the closeness of the result, what real change did this produce and did it open the way for a new level of accommodation with the political demands of Brussels?…”
Section: Latvia's Democratization: External Factors and The European mentioning
confidence: 99%