The European Neighbourhood Policy - Values and Principles

Kochenov, Dimitry; Basheska, Elena

doi:10.4324/9781315672755

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This article contributes to literature that challenges the centrality of secularism in international relations (IR) (Berger, 1999;Birnbaum, 2016;Hurd 2015a;Mitchell, 2014). It confronts the literature on Normative Power Europe, EU foreign policy identity and values that take it for granted that EU secular values are universal and 'a force for good' (Lucarelli & Manners, 2006;Poli, 2016;Risse, 2012), with a few notable exceptions (Kinnvall, 2016;Mitzen, 2006). After all, IR as a discipline emerged with the end of religious wars with the Treaty of Westphalia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

EU religious engagement in the Southern Mediterranean: Much ado about nothing?

Wolff

2017

Mediterranean Politics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the Arab uprisings, religious engagement is central to EU relations with the Southern Mediterranean. Given that the EU is a liberal-secular power, this article investigates why and how the EU is practising religious engagement and whether it is a rupture with past EU modalities of engagement in the region. The main finding is that EU religious engagement constitutes both a physical and ontological security-seeking practice. This is illustrated in three steps. First, EU's physical security is ensured by the promotion of state-sponsored forms of religion in Morocco and Jordan that aim at moderating Islam. Second, the framing of religion as an expertise issue in the EEAS and European diplomacies reinforces EU's self-identity narrative as a secular power. This self-identity is, however, subject to politicization and framing contestation through the case of Freedom of Religion or Belief and the protection of Christian minorities in the Arab world. Overall, this article finds that EU religious engagement is conducive to selective engagement with some religious actors, which could potentially lead to more insecurities and polarization in the region.

show abstract