2014
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2014.873622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Eurasian occurrence of the shovel-tuskerKonobelodon(Mammalia, Proboscidea) as illuminated by its presence in the late Miocene of Pikermi (Greece)

Abstract: Presented here are the tetralophodont proboscidean remains from the late Miocene locality Pikermi (Attica, Greece). The study of the Pikermi tetralophodons and their comparison with other relevant specimens revealed that the late Miocene species 'Tetralophodon' atticus and 'Mastodon' grandincisivus are synonymous. The morphological characters of the Pikermi specimens, as well as of those attributed to 'Mastodon' grandincisivus, are consistent with the North American shovel-tusker Amebelodon (Konobelodon). Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphology of the Samos mandible and the presence of a flattened lower tusk are clearly different from the other proboscideans from Samos (Deinotherium, Mammut, Choerolophodon), and indicate apparent similarities with K. atticus from Pikermi. Therefore, although the deciduous dentition is not visible, the allocation to this taxon is quite confident, taking also into account the features of the lost skull and its dentition (Lehmann 1950;Konidaris et al 2014).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology of the Samos mandible and the presence of a flattened lower tusk are clearly different from the other proboscideans from Samos (Deinotherium, Mammut, Choerolophodon), and indicate apparent similarities with K. atticus from Pikermi. Therefore, although the deciduous dentition is not visible, the allocation to this taxon is quite confident, taking also into account the features of the lost skull and its dentition (Lehmann 1950;Konidaris et al 2014).…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the occurrence, in the early late Miocene of the western Old World, of Tetralophodon longirostris, is generally accepted and well-documented, Turolian or Turolianequivalent faunas yield tetralophodont taxa of more debatable affinities, as observed and discussed by Markov (2008), Konidaris et al (2014), and Tassy (2016). Especially relevant to the discussion on the affinities of the Skoura proboscidean is the presence of tetralophodont amebelodontids in a number of late Miocene localities throughout the Old World, including north Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Systematic Contextmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Teeth-Absence of anancoidy (no alternation of the semilophs, or cross-contacts between them) sets the teeth apart from members of the genus Anancus, and the sub-parallel upper tusks and large lower tusks confirm that the Skoura proboscidean is unconnected to this genus, so that comparisons can be limited to other tetralophodonts. Amebelodontids close to, or identical with the Eurasian species 'Mastodon' grandincisivus are known from the late Miocene of Africa (Gaziry, 1987;discussion in Tassy, 1999discussion in Tassy, , 2003Markov, 2008;Konidaris et al, 2014). The Küçükçekmece second molars (Tassy, 2016), probably belonging to the latter species, are larger than Skoura and display a different morphology, including a more pronounced pretrite trefoil pattern, posttrite ornamentation, pseudoanancoidy, less pronounced antero-posterior compression, and these features on the Skoura teeth are a better match for the morphology in Tetralophodon.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the Turolian, although palaeoecological reconstructions for Central/Western Europe suggest a similar open environment (Agust ı & Ant on 2002), Choerolophodon remained restricted in the south-eastern part of Europe. However, all other contemporary proboscideans of this region À Deinotherium, 'Mammut' and Konobelodon À entered Central Europe (Markov 2008;Konidaris 2013;Konidaris et al 2014). Choerolophodon was probably well adapted in the south-eastern part of Europe so that even minor ecological differences prohibited its 22…”
Section: Dental Microwear Analysis and Palaeoecological Remarksmentioning
confidence: 97%