The EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: lessons learnt

Bennett, Adam; Vines, David

doi:10.1093/oxrep/grab049

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The typing of a specific reason for refusal of recognition and enforcement relating to this issue is a topic that finds ample space for reference to the judicial authorities (Verder, Heintschell Von Heinegg, 2018; 49 . In this spirit, we refer to part III of the TCA which allowed the return to systems of an intergovernmental nature (Bennett, Vines, 2022). It would have represented a 49Our analysis does not take into consideration all the paragraphs of the Regulation 2018/1805 and the related rights.…”

Section: Trade and Cooperation V Protection Of Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

European criminal cooperation: Confiscation and protection of human rights in the post Brexit period

Phil¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work tries to analyze the international cooperation models in the field of seizure and confiscation that are defined in a limited space through the Conventions of the Council of Europe of 1990 and 2005. We proceed with the latest Regulation (EU) 2018/1805 as well as with the agreement on trade and cooperation of 24 December 2020. Note the points of reference and analysis of all three models and operating schemes on the protection of human rights. We also focused on the post-Brexit situation where the United Kingdom, despite its exit from the Union hall, will have to comply with the standards of protection of rights as established by Union law, interpreted by the CJEU and with the aim of continuing the criminal cooperation with the other Member States of the Union.

show abstract

Section: Trade and Cooperation V Protection Of Human Rightsmentioning

confidence: 99%

European criminal cooperation: Confiscation and protection of human rights in the post Brexit period

Phil¹

2023

YIECPL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This continued after 27 April 2021 when the European Parliament approved the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Bennett and Vines (2022).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Brexit policy on textile/clothing and footwear UK imports

English¹

2022

JBRMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On 23 June 2016 the UK voted to leave the EU, (Brexit). A four year and six-month period of uncertainty ensued before Article 50 was activated. Eventually the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) came into force on 1 May 2021. The UK retail sector, in particular the textile/clothing and footwear, relies on high levels of international importation to the UK. As the negotiations between the UK and the EU were undertaken, key elements featured in the development of the new Brexit policy. This paper examines the impact on the textile/clothing and footwear UK importation trade in relation to three of these key elements:- • June 23, 2016, UK voted to leave the EU. • 29 March 2017 Article 50 was triggered. • October 2019 Article 50 extended. The data was modelled using the main five UK import partners in relation to textile/clothing and footwear from the WITS (World Integrated Trade Solution) database and the UK Office of National Statistics annual and monthly data sets, in relation to the three key elements of policy. The study provided an initial insight into the impact of policy decision making during the Brexit process. The findings show that Key elements of Brexit policy making had a negative impact on importation trade in relation to Textile/Clothing and Footwear. Further research is recommended to establish the long-term effects of Brexit policy on the UK retail economy as a whole, over the next five years. This to be extended to the export of textile/clothing and footwear from the UK to EU and Non-EU trading partners.

show abstract

“…2 However, TCA precludes diagonal cumulation. This means that some existing UK-EU trade will now face tariffs and that related imports of inputs may quite possibly disappear as firms reconfigure their supply chains (Fusacchia et al, 2022), in addition to documentary compliance and border delays (Byrne and Rice, 2018;Bennett and Vines, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Indirect Effects of Brexit on African, Caribbean, and Pacific Trade with the UK and EU

Montalbano,

Nenci,

Fusacchia

2023

World Trade Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We analyse the ‘indirect effects’ of Brexit on African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries’ exports that use the UK as a platform to access the EU market and vice versa. First, we use the EORA26 multi-region input–output database for 186 countries and 26 sectors to characterize the ACP domestic content embedded in bilateral trade between the UK and the EU. Second, we apply the GTAP-VA module to carry out a simulation of how the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement will impinge on 121 countries and 65 products. The results suggest that while ‘indirect effects’ on ACP countries’ exports may exist, their economic magnitude is small in aggregate because ACP countries supply only small amounts of inputs used in UK–EU bilateral trade. Our simulations also show that these effects may be offset by the likely increase in ACP domestic content in exports because of TCA friction, mainly towards the UK.

show abstract

The EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: lessons learnt

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

European criminal cooperation: Confiscation and protection of human rights in the post Brexit period

European criminal cooperation: Confiscation and protection of human rights in the post Brexit period

Impact of Brexit policy on textile/clothing and footwear UK imports

The Indirect Effects of Brexit on African, Caribbean, and Pacific Trade with the UK and EU

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About