The EU’s Green Deal: A Third Alternative to Green Growth and Degrowth?

Abstract

In December 2019, the European Union introduced its Green Deal in which the ecological crisis is prioritized. In doing so, the EU seems to be breaking with its traditional green growth discourse. Does it? In this article, we seek to find out whether and to what extent the EC indeed has such a revolutionary cultural, economic and political agenda in mind with its Green Deal. While the green growth discourse presumes a growth-based economy that must become greener, the degrowth discourse questions the growth model and perceives it as ecologically irresponsible. If the European Green Deal represents a third alternative, then it will somehow succeed in prioritizing ecology without welfare loss. To ascertain to what extent the European Green Deal is that third alternative, three preliminary steps need to be undertaken. The first step consists in a brief exposition of the key features of the traditional green growth discourse, as propounded by the EC and its various allies. Thereafter, the overlaps between the green growth discourse and the European Green Deal are noted. In the third section, the latter’s divergences from that previous model are highlighted. In the final section, the main question of the article is answered. It is also suggested that specific interpretations and implementations of the European Green Deal could possibly turn the original communication into an alternative to both green growth and degrowth.

Green Growth Policy, De-Growth, and Sustainability: The Alternative Solution for Achieving the Balance between Both the Natural and the Economic System

“…The problem of De-growth, on the other hand, is the controversy about its ability to articulate a convincing argument regarding the impacts of De-growth on poverty and inequality. As noted by many scholars [30,39], despite De-growth's arguments for quality of life, as depicted in this SI by Ossewaarde and Ossewaarde-Lowtoo (2) [40], there is little [41] and no convincing detail of how the poorest and most vulnerable in the world can achieve improved quality of life within a degrowing economy. Ref.…”

Environmental Economics and the SDGs: A Review of Their Relationships and Barriers

“…On the other hand, the problem with the de-growth is the controversy regarding its ability to articulate a convincing argument about its impacts on inequality and poverty. Despite the argument for quality of life, there is no other convincing information about how the most vulnerable and poorest in the world are able to improve their quality of life within a de-growing economy [81]. For example, according to the global income distribution, the poorest 5% of the population in the United States earns more than 70% of the population in most developing countries.…”

Green Energy in Central and Eastern European (CEE) Countries: New Challenges on the Path to Sustainable Development

“…The membership in the EU structures, in whose policy sustainable and green development has had a strategic place [45,46] for many years, has proven to be a factor intensifying the energy transformation of the CEE countries. In 2019, the European Green Deal was adopted to deal with numerous climate and social problems [47].…”