2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-016-0261-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EU-Korea FTA: anticipation, trade policy uncertainty and impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in this measure of uncertainty is found to lead to greater trade in services. Handley and Limão (2015) and Lakatos and Nilsson (2015) provide confirmatory evidence from alternative natural experiments: the expansion of Portugal's trade with EU Member States upon accession and the expansion of EU-South Korea trade anticipating the coming into force of the EU-South Korea FTA. Conversely, new uncertainty about future market access generated by renegotiation of a trade agreement reduces firm entry into trade and increases firm exit from trade (Crowley et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The reduction in this measure of uncertainty is found to lead to greater trade in services. Handley and Limão (2015) and Lakatos and Nilsson (2015) provide confirmatory evidence from alternative natural experiments: the expansion of Portugal's trade with EU Member States upon accession and the expansion of EU-South Korea trade anticipating the coming into force of the EU-South Korea FTA. Conversely, new uncertainty about future market access generated by renegotiation of a trade agreement reduces firm entry into trade and increases firm exit from trade (Crowley et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The importance of uncertainty has been emphasised by Büge (2013) and Handley and Limao (2017). In the FTA context, Lakatos and Nilsson (2017) show that once the EU-Korea FTA (KOREU) had been agreed, the effect on bilateral trade began years before the FTA was formally implemented. This was because the FTA credibly promised to 'enhance predictability and stability of the trade policy environment in the two markets' (Lakatos & Nilsson 2017).…”
Section: Infrastructure and Trade Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the FTA context, Lakatos and Nilsson (2017) show that once the EU-Korea FTA (KOREU) had been agreed, the effect on bilateral trade began years before the FTA was formally implemented. This was because the FTA credibly promised to 'enhance predictability and stability of the trade policy environment in the two markets' (Lakatos & Nilsson 2017). They relate this predictability not just to traditional trade policy instruments, but also to 'provisions on issues ranging from services and investments; competition and Source: Pomfret and Sourdin (2016 p. 24).…”
Section: Infrastructure and Trade Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results point to sound projections against observed data at the aggregate level and in the largest sectors, such as machinery, as opposed to trade in less important sectors. 21 In a recent econometric ex-post analysis of the EU-Korea FTA, Lakatos and Nilsson (2017) find positive impact of the agreement on exports at the extensive margin of both the EU and Korea. 22 Attempts to incorporate the extensive margin (in terms of new entry of firms) into CGE models have been faced with problems related to model instability due to the standard CES cost function, see Hertel et al (2013).…”
Section: Default Model Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Haskel et al (2007) estimate a positive impact on a UK plant's total factor productivity and the share of a foreign affiliate in the industry of that plant. Lakatos and Nilsson (2017) argue that the increase in predictability of the Korean trade policy regime played an important role in explaining the increase in EU exports to Korea following the conclusion of the EU Korea FTA. Moreover, Handley (2014) shows that binding trade policy commitments also at the level of the WTO make a difference even if applied tariff levels do not change.…”
Section: Common Criticisms and Drawbacks Of Cge Models And Cge Modellmentioning
confidence: 99%