2000
DOI: 10.1006/bcmd.2000.0282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ETS Family Member Tel Antagonizes the Fli-1 Phenotype in Hematopoietic Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we have no evidence that TEL2 is involved in erythroid differentiation, because overexpression of TEL2 in the human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 did not affect its erythroid differentiation induced by sodium butyrate. 1 In addition, overexpression of TEL1 blocks megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells induced by overexpression of Fli-1 (50). TEL1 can interact with FLI-1 through the PNT domain (15), suggesting that the heterodimerization of these ETS factors may interfere with differentiation of the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we have no evidence that TEL2 is involved in erythroid differentiation, because overexpression of TEL2 in the human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line K562 did not affect its erythroid differentiation induced by sodium butyrate. 1 In addition, overexpression of TEL1 blocks megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells induced by overexpression of Fli-1 (50). TEL1 can interact with FLI-1 through the PNT domain (15), suggesting that the heterodimerization of these ETS factors may interfere with differentiation of the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ETS gene TEL can inhibit FLI1 induction of model reporter gene constructs and TEL/FLI1 complexes can be immunoprecipitated from cells overexpressing these two genes (Kwiatkowski et al, 1998). Overexpression of TEL antagonizes FLI1 induced megakaryocytic dierentiation in the K562 leukemia cell line suggesting a biological correlate to the apparent physical interaction of these two proteins (Kwiatkowski et al, 2000). Finally forced expression of FLI1 both antagonizes and is antagonized by a variety of nuclear hormone receptors in a hormone dependent manner but direct physical interaction between these two transcription factor classes has not yet been documented (Darby et al, 1997).…”
Section: Fli1 Has Been Linked To Normal and Malignant Hematopoietic Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fli1 interaction with other proteins can either be positive (e.g., GATA-1 [14,23], serum response factor [SRF] [10,65], and Pax-5 [16,34]) or antagonistic (TEL [27,62], EKLF [60], and retinoic acid receptor [RAR] [11]). Although carboxyterminal truncation of Fli1 (retaining positions 1 to 375) has been reported to not have a significant effect on DNA binding specificity in vitro (35), the CTA domain is required for maximal activation of promoter-reporters, as shown by in vitro transient-transfection studies (49).…”
Section: Cd42mentioning
confidence: 99%