1980
DOI: 10.2307/1919495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethnic Origins of the American People, 1790

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American Historical Association (AHA) used it in the 1930s to calculate the ethnic makeup of the United States at the time of the American Revolution, and has been used in several studies to identify the American--Hispanic population (see Barker and Hansen 1932;Willie 1960;Buechley 1961;Matute--Bianchi 1986). By the 1980s, that original report from the AHA sparked a heated exchange in the pages of William and Mary Quarterly (McDonald and McDonald 1980;Akenson 1984;Purvis 1984). The original authors were accused of conducting their analysis with inappropriate data and making poor methodological decisions.…”
Section: A) Surname Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American Historical Association (AHA) used it in the 1930s to calculate the ethnic makeup of the United States at the time of the American Revolution, and has been used in several studies to identify the American--Hispanic population (see Barker and Hansen 1932;Willie 1960;Buechley 1961;Matute--Bianchi 1986). By the 1980s, that original report from the AHA sparked a heated exchange in the pages of William and Mary Quarterly (McDonald and McDonald 1980;Akenson 1984;Purvis 1984). The original authors were accused of conducting their analysis with inappropriate data and making poor methodological decisions.…”
Section: A) Surname Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colonies were long open to migrants, more so than were the colonies of the other settling nations, leading to large infl ows and, because there were no broad restrictions on religious or national origins, the colonies were open to migrants from diverse countries and religions (Baseler 1998;Risch 1937;Proper 1900;Brite 1939). It is estimated that the English and Scots accounted for two-thirds of the 1790 population, and the Irish about 10 percent, the Germans 6 percent, and other Northwestern European about 6 percent (McDonald and McDonald 1980). The thirteen colonies each had their own rules regarding immigration and other matters, and it was only after the Revolution that a central control over migration occurred.…”
Section: Settling the Coloniesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, Donald Akenson argued-with undeniable industry and cleverness-that all attempts to extract national origins information from the surnames in the 1790 census rest upon implicit assumptions that are almost certainly false. 45 Others, notably Forrest McDonald and Ellen Shapiro McDonald 46 and Thomas L. Purvis, 47 argued that, by correcting some of the more obvious errors in the procedures used by the ACLS committee, it was still possible to extract some useful information, especially if we were willing to settle for ballpark estimates rather than exactitude. Purvis's analysis, in particular, suggests that the ACLS report seriously undercounted the Scotch-Irish and that the proportion of household heads who were of Scotch-Irish descent was closer to 10.5 percent.…”
Section: The Stories Historians Tellmentioning
confidence: 99%