2022
DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2022.2082969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ethics of self-tracking. A comprehensive review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of regulations concerning the use of health and fitness SSTs (e.g., Wieczorek et al 2023) is a pressing concern due to the potential risk to consumer health and well-being. With the increasing prevalence of these technologies, it has become imperative to develop regulations and establish public policies aimed at harnessing the positive potential of these technologies to promote health, and avoiding the potential risk to improve consumer well-being.…”
Section: Practical Implications For Marketers and Public Policy Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of regulations concerning the use of health and fitness SSTs (e.g., Wieczorek et al 2023) is a pressing concern due to the potential risk to consumer health and well-being. With the increasing prevalence of these technologies, it has become imperative to develop regulations and establish public policies aimed at harnessing the positive potential of these technologies to promote health, and avoiding the potential risk to improve consumer well-being.…”
Section: Practical Implications For Marketers and Public Policy Makersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connectivity offered by health-related apps and devices, as well as the greater circulation of health data have led to the creation of online patient communities and the Quantified Self (QS) movement—groups that coordinate and encourage contacts between various users of mHealth and other self-monitoring technologies. Admittedly, QS has been widely criticized as contributing to the trend of individual responsibilization that we discussed in this paper (see Ruckenstein and Pantzar, 2017 , for a detailed overview of the movement) and the literature discusses its impact on health perception as, at best, ambiguous ( Wieczorek et al ., 2022 ). However, empirical investigations into the movement and various user and patient-centric communities demonstrate that they can serve as a valuable tool for increasing public participation and interest in the provision of health care, as well as lead to feelings of solidarity and care among its members (see e.g.…”
Section: Patient Communities and The Quantified Self Movement As A Wa...mentioning
confidence: 99%