2017
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ethics of parental refusal of newborn vitamin K prophylaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, repeated refusal of parents to give the vitamin to their babies has led to an increased rate of bleeding disorders due to vitamin K deficiency. [13][14][15] According to a study, vitamin K is commonly given as prophylaxis after birth to prevent the newborn's hemorrhagic disease (HDN). Among infants who have not received vitamin K prophylaxis at birth, the incidence of HDN is estimated at 35 (10.5 to 80) per 100,000 live births, being lower in high-income countries at 8.8 (5.8 to 17.8) per 100,000 live births.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, repeated refusal of parents to give the vitamin to their babies has led to an increased rate of bleeding disorders due to vitamin K deficiency. [13][14][15] According to a study, vitamin K is commonly given as prophylaxis after birth to prevent the newborn's hemorrhagic disease (HDN). Among infants who have not received vitamin K prophylaxis at birth, the incidence of HDN is estimated at 35 (10.5 to 80) per 100,000 live births, being lower in high-income countries at 8.8 (5.8 to 17.8) per 100,000 live births.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for parental decline of vitamin K have been studied worldwide, with very similar results [15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The principal concerns generally cited are: (1) increased risk of cancer, especially childhood leukemia (not supported by available data);…”
Section: Reasons For Refusal Of Vitamin Kmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The current overall incidences of lack of neonatal Vitamin K administration and or late VKDB in the United States is unclear. Studies in New Zealand, Australia, Canada and Great Britain suggest incidences of refusal of parental vitamin K administration at birth of 1-7% [9,16,17]. Estimates for the USA range from 0-3.2% of births in hospitals, 14.5% in home births and up to 31% in birthing centers [18].…”
Section: Why a Resurgence Of Late Vkdb?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 appropriate balance between these 2 issues is essential because parents who perceive health professionals as overly coercive or manipulative may disengage not only with vitamin K prophylaxis but also with other subsequent medical services. 27 Therefore, we detail in the following paragraphs the known barriers to vitamin K prophylaxis and how these have evolved over time.…”
Section: Latementioning
confidence: 99%