The Ethics of Managing Affective and Emotional States to Improve Informed Consent: Autonomy, Comprehension, and Voluntariness

Abstract

Over the past several decades the 'affective revolution' in cognitive psychology has emphasized the critical role affect and emotion play in human decision-making. Drawing on this affective literature, various commentators have recently proposed strategies for managing therapeutic expectation that use contextual, symbolic, or emotive interventions in the consent process to convey information or enhance comprehension. In this paper, we examine whether affective consent interventions that target affect and emotion can be reconciled with widely accepted standards for autonomous action. More specifically, the ethics of affective consent interventions is assessed in terms of key elements of autonomy, comprehension and voluntariness. While there may appear to be a moral obligation to manage the affective environment to ensure valid informed consent, in circumstances where volunteers may be prone to problematic therapeutic expectancy, this moral obligation needs to be weighed against the potential risks of human instrumentalization. At this point in time we do not have enough information to be able to justify clearly the programmatic manipulation of human subjects' affective states. The lack of knowledge about affective interventions requires corresponding caution in its ethical justification.

Prenatal β‐thalassemia carrier screening in Australia: healthcare professionals' perspectives of clinical practice

“…These healthcare professionals believe that as long as their patient is informed that they are being tested then consent has been given either verbally or implicitly by having their blood collected. This is a pragmatic interpretation of informed consent and has been shown in other studies of clinical practice, for example, in physiotherapy, but it does not meet the autonomous perspective of informed consent …”

Autonomia da pessoa com problema de álcool: consentimento informado

“…Sob pano de fundo ansioso, os medos de parar o consumo, de recair ou de se entregar à confiança na relação de cuidado podem surgir incontidos e gerar respostas impulsivas que comprometem as perceções e os julgamentos mais precisos a respeito da sua condição e do tratamento [26][27][28][29] , fazendo refletir o papel do álcool como automedicação 14 e a pertinência do tratamento integrado para a pessoa com esta comorbidade 41 .…”

“…O medo de parar o consumo, de recair ou de confiar na relação de cuidado, mobilizado pela condição pessoal e intensificado pela relação com pessoas e situações dão sentido ao modo como muitos pacientes respondem negativamente ou desenvolvem atitudes erráticas. Essas respostas são uma forma de evitar sentimentos dolorosos de incapacidade, de autodesvalorização ou de culpa por perdas afetivas reais ou imaginárias, que acabam por afetar as perceções e os julgamentos mais precisos a respeito da sua condição e do tratamento, incluindo de suas consequências futuras [26][27][28][29] .…”

Informed Consent and Fresh Egg Donation for Stem Cell Research

“…Patients are asked to review and consider a consent form containing accessibly written, scientific discourse detailing information on potential side effects, the percentage-chance of various risks, and a relatively linear, smooth account of the treatment trajectory (Franklin and Kaufman 2009;Rid and Dinhofer 2009). Although crucial to proper decision-making, this format risks sidelining the contribution of "tacit knowledge based on personal experiences" (Corrigan 2003, 777), "prior experiences and personal biography" (Corrigan 2003, 776), and the role of emotion and intuition (Little et al 2008;Braude and Kimmelman 2010;Halpern 2010). It is this experiential, affective dimension of decision-making that we designate as embodied knowledge, including as it does the consequences of particular lived histories, desires, and fluctuations in health and illness.…”