2022
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2022.2042184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethics of Geography–Military Relations: A Reply to Our Interlocutors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflecting this tension, Buttimer (1974: 1) wrote that neither objective or subjective approaches to ethics ‘deals adequately with the ambiguous arena of ideals and conflicts’ in geographic praxis. Recent debates over American geography’s relation to the U.S. military show these considerations continue to matter, such as whether human dignity is an absolute value, or whether some oblique harms are justified given the situational contexts of ethics (see the exchange: Wainwright and Weaver 2021, 2022; Rose-Redwood et al, 2022).…”
Section: Ethics Of Anti-oppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting this tension, Buttimer (1974: 1) wrote that neither objective or subjective approaches to ethics ‘deals adequately with the ambiguous arena of ideals and conflicts’ in geographic praxis. Recent debates over American geography’s relation to the U.S. military show these considerations continue to matter, such as whether human dignity is an absolute value, or whether some oblique harms are justified given the situational contexts of ethics (see the exchange: Wainwright and Weaver 2021, 2022; Rose-Redwood et al, 2022).…”
Section: Ethics Of Anti-oppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%