This paper considers the impact of a small-scale action research project which focused on the development of an emergent approach to curriculum making in a GCSE (General Certificate in Secondary Education) course in geography. In this context we argue that complexity thinking offers a useful theoretical foundation from which to understand the nature of dynamic pedagogic change resulting from the application of action research methods.Results show that process-focused curriculum change can bring about shifts in both learning and assessment. This is seen as being the result of an emergence orientated approach to action research as a counter to more reductionist approaches which are often used and advocated in educational settings by teachers. We conclude that a combination of complexity thinking and action research can offer a valuable medium through which the educational needs of learners and teachers can be addressed in different, localised contexts.
2Keywords: curriculum change, action research, complexity thinking, classroom pedagogy, emergence.
IntroductionThe introduction of a National Curriculum in England in 1988 (DES 1987, 1989 led to a diminution of the role of teachers as curriculum developers, the result of a forced migration to a more centralised education system by the government of the day. This shift was in part due to the introduction of a content heavy curriculum framework which meant that teachers were increasingly compelled to serve as 'deliverers', rather than 'creators', of that content.However, in September 2003 a small-scale pilot General Certificate in Secondary Education (GCSE, taken by 14-16 year olds in England, Wales and Northern Ireland) in geography was launched which offered a number of original features to encourage innovative approaches to teaching and learning geography. These features included new areas of subject content for geography at this level, including cultural geography, planning and a module on Geographic Information Systems (GIS). In addition, the new content was embedded within a flexible curriculum which allowed teachers and students a wide choice of the content they wished to study; the philosophy underpinning the curriculum was one which advocated depth of study over breadth. Finally, the assessment regime included a variety of assessment approaches which assessed worked completed within the course rather than emphasising traditional terminal examinations.The new departures offered by the project created an opportunity for teachers to develop innovative approaches to both curriculum making and assessment as little pre-existing material was available, giving the teachers involved a more central role in developing the course.. It was this potential for innovation in curriculum making, learning and assessment which motivated teachers, academics and researchers to become involved in the Pilot Geography GCSE. The philosophy of this course allowed, and indeed encouraged, the adoption of new approaches to both curriculum construction and pedagogical practice, whe...