2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9099-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Although the academic interest in ethical mutual fund performance has developed steadily, the evidence to date is mainly sample-specific. To tackle this critique, new research should extend to unexplored countries. Using this as a motivation, we examine the performance and risk sensitivities of Canadian ethical mutual funds vis-à-vis their conventional peers. In order to overcome the methodological deficiencies most prior papers suffered from, we use performance measurement approaches in the spirit of Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
197
1
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
16
197
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies argue that in Canada, because of the dependency on fossil fuel, divestment would not be possible without being exposed to higher risk (Ritchie & Dowlatabadi, 2015). Other studies on SRI in Canada, however, proposed a positive correlation between CSP and financial performance for Canadian firms (Makni, Francoeur, & Bellavance, 2009), but did not suggest significant differences in the financial performance of responsible investment funds and conventional funds (Bauer, Derwall, & Otten, 2007). Weber (2016), however, found that Canadian funds that are less exposed to climate risks outperform their competitors with higher climate risk exposure and Rubin suggests that fossil fuel divestment will increases financial returns in Canada (Rubin, 2016).…”
Section: Methods and Samplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies argue that in Canada, because of the dependency on fossil fuel, divestment would not be possible without being exposed to higher risk (Ritchie & Dowlatabadi, 2015). Other studies on SRI in Canada, however, proposed a positive correlation between CSP and financial performance for Canadian firms (Makni, Francoeur, & Bellavance, 2009), but did not suggest significant differences in the financial performance of responsible investment funds and conventional funds (Bauer, Derwall, & Otten, 2007). Weber (2016), however, found that Canadian funds that are less exposed to climate risks outperform their competitors with higher climate risk exposure and Rubin suggests that fossil fuel divestment will increases financial returns in Canada (Rubin, 2016).…”
Section: Methods and Samplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They extend their study to the Australian market using the same methods. They investigate the performance of 25 ethical mutual funds compared to the Worldscope Australian Index, showing equal performance for the period between 1996 and 2003, after a catch-up period between 1992 and 1996 (Bauer et al 2006); a further analysis performed on the Canadian market comes up with the same results (Bauer et al 2007). Kreander et al (2005) study 60 European funds 30 ethical, and 30 non-ethical over the period 1995-2001 using a matched pair analysis, and find no signs of significant outperformance of the ethical funds over the non-ethical funds.…”
Section: Performance Of Sr Investmentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, some studies find that social responsible investing might have better performance than 1 See, for instance, White (1995), Statman(2000), Derwall et al (2005), Benson et al (2006), Gil-Bazo et al (2010) or Derwall and Koedijk (2009). 2 See, respectively, Gregory et al (1997), Bauer et al (2007) and Fernandez and Matallin (2008). conventional funds with similar characteristics (see Kempf and Osthoff (2007) and Galema et al (2008) on US stock portfolios, or Fernandez and Matallin (2008) and GilBazo et al (2010) on Spanish and US mutual funds).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%