1996
DOI: 10.2307/3179991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ethical Dilemma Facing Conservation: Care and Treatment of Human Skeletal Remains and Mortuary Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By giving some forethought to the handling of human skeletal remains, researchers can avoid most of the problems documented here. These suggestions are based on bone-care guidelines provided by conservators from museums and university laboratories (Antoine and Taylor 2014; Cassman and Odegaard 2004; Johnson 1994; McGowan and LaRoche 1996; Wills et al 2014)…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By giving some forethought to the handling of human skeletal remains, researchers can avoid most of the problems documented here. These suggestions are based on bone-care guidelines provided by conservators from museums and university laboratories (Antoine and Taylor 2014; Cassman and Odegaard 2004; Johnson 1994; McGowan and LaRoche 1996; Wills et al 2014)…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to human remains, the perspectives of osteological and bioanthropological specialists, archaeologists, and conservators, as well as descendant and/or deeply invested local communities, can all significantly shape specific choices about whether and how they are uncovered during archaeological excavations and about subsequent handling and curation (Cassman and Odegaard 2004, 2007; Cassman et al 2007; McGowan and LaRoche 1996; Williams 2001). Within the conservation profession, which has long articulated the importance of clear treatment plans and the thoughtful choice of methods to achieve them, these collaborations have sharpened scrutiny of the potential impact of any conservation intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%