2001
DOI: 10.1007/pl00011617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Essential Spectrum and Banach Reducibility of Operator Weighted Shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It implies that σ(S + ) ⊂ Ω 0 . By Proposition 2.3 in [5], moreover, we have that S − ∈ B n (Ω 0 ). Set Ω = Ω 0 \σ(S + ).…”
Section: Proof Of the Theorem And Its Corollariesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It implies that σ(S + ) ⊂ Ω 0 . By Proposition 2.3 in [5], moreover, we have that S − ∈ B n (Ω 0 ). Set Ω = Ω 0 \σ(S + ).…”
Section: Proof Of the Theorem And Its Corollariesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Hence, S + cannot be a Cowen-Douglas operator. When S * + is a Cowen-Douglas operator has been characterized in [5]. In this note, we will prove the following theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [4], Ben-Artzi and Gohberg introduced the concepts of Bohl exponent and canonical splitting projection to describe the spectrum and the essential spectrum of operator weighted shifts of finite multiplicity (see also [10]). However, in the general setting of bilateral operator weighted shifts of infinite multiplicity, the complete description of the spectrum and its parts is not yet settled.…”
Section: Conversely Suppose That P(s X) < N(s X) and Letmentioning
confidence: 99%