2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)

Abstract: The 140-square-degrees Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) field, observed with the extended ROentgen Survey with an Imaging Telescope Array (eROSITA) on board the Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG) mission, provides a first look at the variable eROSITA sky. We analysed the intrinsic X-ray variability of the eFEDS sources and provide X-ray light curves and tables with variability test results in the 0.2-2.3 keV (soft) and 2.3-5.0 keV (hard) bands. We performed variability tests using the traditional normalised ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic analysis of the variability of all sources detected in the eFEDS field is presented by Boller et al (2022). This variability study refers to all objects in the official eFEDS source catalog, which comprises our 14 detected M dwarfs.…”
Section: Light-curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic analysis of the variability of all sources detected in the eFEDS field is presented by Boller et al (2022). This variability study refers to all objects in the official eFEDS source catalog, which comprises our 14 detected M dwarfs.…”
Section: Light-curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability study refers to all objects in the official eFEDS source catalog, which comprises our 14 detected M dwarfs. We extracted the variability metrics for these 14 stars from the catalog of Boller et al (2022). Specifically, this catalog provides the normalized excess variance (NEV) as defined by Boller et al (2016) and its uncertainty.…”
Section: Light-curve Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 to the intrinsic flux variability of AGN. This effect is discussed further in Boller et al (2022).…”
Section: Aperture Photometry and Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The calculation of fluxes for the eFEDS and XMM-ATLAS fields was based on aperture photometry and used the Bayesian method described by Laird et al (2009) and Georgakakis & Nandra (2011). A description of the basic flux-estimation algorithm is also provided in Boller et al (2022). The fluxes in both samples are estimated in the 0.5-2 keV spectral band assuming a power-law spectral model with Γ = 1.4 that is absorbed by a Galactic column density of log N H /cm −2 = 20.3.…”
Section: Aperture Photometry and Number Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation