2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS)

Abstract: Context. During the performance verification phase of the SRG/eROSITA telescope, the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) has been carried out. It covers a 140 deg 2 field located at 126 • < R.A. < 146 • and -3 • < Dec. < +6 • with a nominal unvignetted exposure over the field of 2.2 ks. 542 candidate clusters and groups were detected in this field, down to a flux limit F X ∼ 10 −14 erg s −1 cm −2 in the 0.5-2 keV band. Aims. In order to understand radio-mode feedback in galaxy clusters, we study the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, combining X-ray and SZ surveys is particularly efficient to find new galaxy clusters and derive their mass (see, e.g., ComPRASS; Tarrío et al 2019). The potential of the joint analysis of LOFAR and eROSITA observations of galaxy clusters has been demonstrated by recent papers (e.g., Ghirardini et al 2021;Pasini et al 2022;Brienza et al 2021). Until the eRASS data are publicly released, we are planning to follow-up a subsample of clusters with Chandra and/or XMM-Newton.…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, combining X-ray and SZ surveys is particularly efficient to find new galaxy clusters and derive their mass (see, e.g., ComPRASS; Tarrío et al 2019). The potential of the joint analysis of LOFAR and eROSITA observations of galaxy clusters has been demonstrated by recent papers (e.g., Ghirardini et al 2021;Pasini et al 2022;Brienza et al 2021). Until the eRASS data are publicly released, we are planning to follow-up a subsample of clusters with Chandra and/or XMM-Newton.…”
Section: Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subsample of 542 extended sources is compiled by selecting sources with a source extent larger than zero, an extent likelihood higher than 6, and a detection likelihood higher than 5 (Liu et al 2022a;Klein et al 2021). We only use this sample for comparisons in this work, while the detailed analysis of these clusters is provided in Liu et al (2022a), Ghirardini et al (2021a), Bahar et al (2022), andPasini et al (2022).…”
Section: Sample Source Classification and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we summarize the LOFAR (van Haarlem et al 2013) radio properties of the clusters and groups in the point source catalog and provide a comparison with the extent-selected sample. The details of the radio data analysis are already provided in detail in Pasini et al (2022). We therefore omit them here and provide the results.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Source Classification Through Lofar ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with the positional offset between the CAMIRA and XXL clusters (Oguri et al 2018), the present sample has a marginally smaller fraction of well-centered clusters and a lower tail component. Pasini et al (2022) show that BCGs with radio-loud AGN are more likely to lie close to the cluster center than radio-quiet BCGs and that the relations between the AGN and the ICM hold regardless of the dynamical state of the cluster (see also Pasini et al 2020).…”
Section: Bcg-x-ray Offset and Cluster Dynamical Statusmentioning
confidence: 96%