2017
DOI: 10.14740/wjon1019w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Era of Multigene Panels Comes? The Clinical Utility of Oncotype DX and MammaPrint

Abstract: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, eighth edition published in late 2016, will become the new global guideline for cancer diagnosis and treatment from January 1, 2018. The new edition for the tumor staging system has numerous updates, including building up the prognostic stage group of tumors for the first time and adding a large number of non-anatomical factors into the prognostic evaluation. Oncotype DX and MammaPrint are two of the genomic predictors that will be part of routine clinical practice in the future… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final decision regarding the delivery of chemotherapy was based on the RS over a patient's PREDICT or NPI score. This practice, which enabled the MDT to safely spare patients from adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, is a strategy supported by published data that suggests that ODX is superior to other clinicopathological factors at identifying patients who may not benefit from chemotherapy [12]. In addition, as a tool for risk stratifying women with ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer, ODX testing has been shown to be superior to the utilisation of clinicopathological factors [13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The final decision regarding the delivery of chemotherapy was based on the RS over a patient's PREDICT or NPI score. This practice, which enabled the MDT to safely spare patients from adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, is a strategy supported by published data that suggests that ODX is superior to other clinicopathological factors at identifying patients who may not benefit from chemotherapy [12]. In addition, as a tool for risk stratifying women with ER-positive, node-negative breast cancer, ODX testing has been shown to be superior to the utilisation of clinicopathological factors [13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…RS can predict chemotherapy sensitivity in patients with ER+, node-negative breast cancer [6]. Paik et al studied 651 cases of breast cancer who were enrolled in NSABP B-20 and randomly assigned them into a TAM group and a TAM combined with the chemotherapy group [chemotherapy regimen for cyclophosphamide & methotrexate & fluorouracil (CMF) or MF regimen, TAM + CMF/MF group] [4].…”
Section: Genomic Tools: Oncotype DXmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first genomic assays developed for this purpose was MammaPrint, which combines the gene expression of 70 genes [54]. It requires freshly frozen tissue collected into an RNA preservative solution, which makes it more complex to conduct than other panels [55]. Although MammaPrint has been shown to have prognostic significance, it performs best as a predictor of distant metastasis during the first 5 years after treatment.…”
Section: Prognostic Gene Expression Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical computation of the weighted expression of each gene results in a recurrence score which may be divided into three categories with low, intermediate and high risk [55]. BCI is another algorithmic gene expressionbased signature which also divides the patients into three groups, but involving fewer genes [60].…”
Section: Prognostic Gene Expression Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation