2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00574-012-0009-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The equations of almost complete intersections

Abstract: In this paper we inject four Hilbert functions in the determination of the defining equations of the Rees algebra of almost complete intersections of finite colength. Because three of the corresponding modules are Artinian, some of these relationships are very effective, with the novel approach opening up tracks to the determination of the equations and also to processes of going from homologically defined sets of equations to higher degrees ones. While not specifically directed towards the extraction of elimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [12], F. Muiños and F. Planas-Vilanova recover this result by proving in addition that there is a unique defining equation of R(I ) of maximal degree. Also, their work recovers Theorem 2.3.3 in [19], for the case reduction number equal to 1 (see also [9]). For the relation between the reltype and the reduction number, see for example [10,11,16], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In [12], F. Muiños and F. Planas-Vilanova recover this result by proving in addition that there is a unique defining equation of R(I ) of maximal degree. Also, their work recovers Theorem 2.3.3 in [19], for the case reduction number equal to 1 (see also [9]). For the relation between the reltype and the reduction number, see for example [10,11,16], among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…As a consequence, one has e 1 (I) = 1 2 (d 2 − d) = d 2 and deg(R/I) = d (see [4,Proposition 3.3]). It also follows that the reduction number of I is d − 1.…”
Section: Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a known argument as in [5], one can show that the maximal minors of ψ are polynomial relations of the 5 original quadrics. Therefore, since dim k[I] = 3 the codimension of the ideal I 3 (ψ) is at most 2.…”
Section: Exceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%