The EQ-5D: A useful quality of life measure in borderline personality disorder?

Asselt, Antoinette D. I. van; Dirksen, Carmen D.; Arntz, Arnoud; Giesen-Bloo, Josephine; Severens, Johan L.

doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.11.001

Cited by 38 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean age of participants with personality disorders, reported in 9 of the 10 studies, ranged between 29.4 and 45 years. 96,[119][120][121][124][125][126][127][128] Two studies 120,127 investigated the known-group validity of the EQ-5D, one study 127 investigated the convergent validity of the EQ-5D and four studies [124][125][126]128 investigated the responsiveness of the EQ-5D. Two studies 119,121 investigated the known-group validity of the SF-36 and two studies 96,122,123 investigated this property in the SF-12.…”

Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies were undertaken in four countries. Nine 96,[119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128] of the 10 studies presented data for different personality disorders together. One study looked exclusively at individuals with borderline personality disorder.…”

Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…96,[119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128] Six studies looked at the EQ-5D, 120,[124][125][126][127][128] two at the SF-36 119,121 and two at the SF-12 (corresponding to three articles). 96,122,123 No studies were found investigating the validity or responsiveness of the SF-6D in this patient group.…”

Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures

Brazier

Connell

Papaioannou

et al. 2014

Health Technology Assessment

197

170

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, et al. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess 2014;18(34). This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/). Health Technology Assessment is indexed and abstracted inEditorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme or, commissioned/managed through the Methodology research programme (MRP), and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions. To strengthen the evidence base for health research, the MRP oversees and implements the evolving strategy for high quality methodological research. In addition to the MRC and NIHR funding partners, the MRP takes into account the needs of other stakeholders including the devolved administrations, industry R&D, and regulatory/advisory agencies and other public bodies. The MRP funds investigator-led and needsled research proposals from across the UK. In addition to the standard MRC and RCUK terms and conditions, projects commissioned/managed by the MRP are expected to provide a detailed report on the research findings and may publish the findings in the HTA journal, if supported by NIHR funds.The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy o...

show abstract

Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Bipolar Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures

Brazier

Connell

Papaioannou

et al. 2014

Health Technology Assessment

197

170

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No studies were found investigating the validity or responsiveness of the SF-6D in this patient group. Six studies were undertaken in the Netherlands (Bartak et al, 2010;Bartak et al, 2011a;Bartak et al, 2011b;Soeteman et al, 2005;Soeteman, Verheul and Busschbach, 2008;van Asselt et al, 2009). Two studies were undertaken in Australia (Jackson and Burgess, 2002;Sanderson and Andrews, 2002).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six studies looked at the EQ-5D (Bartak et al, 2010;Bartak et al, 2011a;Bartak et al, 2011b;Soeteman et al, 2005;Soeteman, Verheul and Busschbach, 2008;van Asselt et al, 2009), two at the SF-36 (Narud, Mykletun and Dahl, 2005;Hueston, Mainous and Schilling, 1996) and two at the SF-12 (corresponding to 3 articles) (Jackson and Burgess, 2000;Jackson and Burgess, 2002;Sanderson and Andrews, 2002). No studies were found investigating the validity or responsiveness of the SF-6D in this patient group.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Measure Quality of Life for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review

Papaioannou

Brazier²,

Parry³

2013

Journal of Personality Disorders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the construct validity and responsiveness of four generic health related quality of life (HRQL) measures in personality disorders (PDs).Methods: A systematic review was undertaken. Ten databases were searched and reference lists scrutinised to identify relevant studies. Relevant data were extracted accordingly. A narrative synthesis was performed of the evidence on construct validity including known groups validity (detecting differences in HRQL scores between two different groups), convergent validity (strength of association between generic HRQL and other measures (e.g. symptom) and responsiveness (differences in generic HRQL measure scores in responders/non-responders or correlation with changes in other measures).Results: Ten studies were identified, with 6 for the EQ-5D, two involving SF-36 and another 2 the SF-12, but none on the SF-6D. Evidence indicated that the EQ-5D, SF-36 and SF-12 were probably valid measures within PDs. Four studies demonstrated that the EQ-5D Index was able to detect changes in patients. Conclusion:Generic HRQL measures appear appropriate for use in people with PDs in terms of psychometric performance. However, qualitative concerns remain as to whether they fully reflect the impact of the condition.4

show abstract

Benchmarks for dialectical behavioural therapy intervention in adults and adolescents with borderline personality symptoms

Azevedo,

Carreiras,

Hibbs

et al. 2024

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EQ-5D: A useful quality of life measure in borderline personality disorder?

Abstract: We conclude that the EQ-5D is fairly responsive in BPD, and, therefore, especially because of its brevity and user-friendliness, can serve as a useful tool in economic evaluations in patients with BPD.

Cited by 38 publications

References 36 publications

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures

How to Measure Quality of Life for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review

Benchmarks for dialectical behavioural therapy intervention in adults and adolescents with borderline personality symptoms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About