1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00179-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The epsilon variables for electroweak precision tests: a reappraisal

Abstract: We update the analysis of the precision electroweak tests in terms of the previously introduced epsilon parameters, by taking into account the new experimental information (i.e. the data presented at the Glasgow Conference) and some recent theoretical progress in the computation of radiative corrections in the Standard Model. At the same time we further clarify some important points, as, for example, the dependence of the analysis on the input values of α s (m Z ) and α(m Z ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• χ 2 EW for precision electroweak measurements i (i = 1, 2, 3) [69][70][71] or equivalently S, T and U parameters [72,73]. We use the formulas for the self-energies of the gauge bosons γ, W ± and Z in [74] to calculate these observables, and the fit results in [75] to get the χ 2 EW .…”
Section: Strategy In Scanning the Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• χ 2 EW for precision electroweak measurements i (i = 1, 2, 3) [69][70][71] or equivalently S, T and U parameters [72,73]. We use the formulas for the self-energies of the gauge bosons γ, W ± and Z in [74] to calculate these observables, and the fit results in [75] to get the χ 2 EW .…”
Section: Strategy In Scanning the Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electroweak precision test with the Z-pole data at LEP and SLC has provided highly accurate examination of the SM and stringent constraints on the new physics beyond the SM [16]. Here we make the nonstandard precision analysis of our model with the precision variables ǫ i 's defined by Altarelli et al [17,18]. Our method provides a model independent way for the electroweak precision test.…”
Section: Electroweak Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other parametrisations exist where the quadratic terms originating from fermion loops are absorbed into one parameter. The most commonly used parameter sets are the S, T, and U parameters [114] and the " parameters [115], respectively, which are basically equivalent. The " parameters are dened as 11 `= ( `) Born ( 1 + 1 : 20" 1 0:26" 3 ) A 0; FB = A 0; FB Born ( 1 + 3 4 : 72" 1 45:15" 3 ) b = ( b ) Born ( 1 + 1 : 42" 1 0:54" 3 + 2 : 29" b ) ; where QCD corrections and the running of QED are already included in the Born terms.…”
Section: Model Independent Parametrisationmentioning
confidence: 99%