The Structures of Practical Knowledge 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45671-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Epistemology of Practical Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is well known, writing in vernacular was a way to reach a different audience, usually more technology oriented and less connected to the classic academic milieu. This shift in the content of the treatises also seems to have been a decisive characteristic 38 . The demonstration for this is the identification of an edition as disruptive that was published in Spanish in 1535 and authored by Francisco Faleiro (hdl.handle.net/21.11103/sphaera.101182).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it is well known, writing in vernacular was a way to reach a different audience, usually more technology oriented and less connected to the classic academic milieu. This shift in the content of the treatises also seems to have been a decisive characteristic 38 . The demonstration for this is the identification of an edition as disruptive that was published in Spanish in 1535 and authored by Francisco Faleiro (hdl.handle.net/21.11103/sphaera.101182).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The editions that allowed this knowledge to become disruptive, however, are not necessarily the translations into vernacular. An interesting example is the first (Latin) edition of Oronce Fine’s Cosmographia in 1532 (hdl.handle.net/21.11103/sphaera.101190) and its second edition ten years later 38 . These editions appear to have been disruptive, and indeed starting seven further editions were issued between 1551 and 1587, three of which were in French, one in Italian, and further two in Latin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship in the history of science has shown that the rise of a new knowledge culture in early modern Europe benefited from the accumulation, structuring, and valuation of practical knowledge (including tacit and embodied knowledge). Scholarship on artisanal epistemologies in particular has called into question traditional distinctions between the hand and the mind as well as between theory and practice (Roberts, Schaffer, and Dear 2007;Smith and Schmidt 2007;Smith 2004;Smith 2009;Valleriani 2017;Long 2012;Dupré, De Munck, and Clarke 2012;Dupré and Göttler 2017). Moreover, recent scholarship has examined how and why knowledge was codified and visualized (Smith and Beentjes 2010;Smith 2010;Harkness 2007;Long 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrews (), (2015); Ash (), (); Ash (); Bertucci (); Dupré and Lüthy (); Dupré (); Harkness (); Klein and Spary (); Klein (); Leong and Rankin (); Roberts, Schaffer, and Dear (); Smith and Findlen (); Smith and Schmidt (); Smith, Meyers, and Cook (); Valleriani (); Van Damme ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%