The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1186/cc12598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study

Abstract: IntroductionTo provide up-to-date information on the prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients in intensive care units (ICUs).MethodsProspective, multicenter, observational cohort study in ICUs from 14 French general (non-academic) and university teaching hospitals. All consecutive patients with septic shock admitted between November 2009 and March 2011 were eligible for inclusion. We prospectively recorded data regarding patient characteristics, infection, severi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

9
88
6
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
9
88
6
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing interest in these new applications of PMX-DHP was firstly experienced in Japan. In this population the mortality rate was similar to that reported for septic shock in recent epidemiologic studies [9,10]. However, there were some differences in the abdominal group that may have influenced the results: the time of inclusion in 20% of nonabdominal patients exceeded 48 h, suggesting a delayed intervention in which clinical conditions deteriorated to such an extent that they could not be recovered by removing endotoxin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The growing interest in these new applications of PMX-DHP was firstly experienced in Japan. In this population the mortality rate was similar to that reported for septic shock in recent epidemiologic studies [9,10]. However, there were some differences in the abdominal group that may have influenced the results: the time of inclusion in 20% of nonabdominal patients exceeded 48 h, suggesting a delayed intervention in which clinical conditions deteriorated to such an extent that they could not be recovered by removing endotoxin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…1 \10 € drugs, 2 10-100 € drugs, 3 100-1000 € drugs, 4 more than 1000 € drugs, 5 plasma, 6 red cells, 7 platelets, 8 blood derivatives, 9 basic radiology, 10 echo-Doppler, 11 computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, 12 specialized radiology, 13 hematology, 14 biochemistry, 15 toxicology, 16 microbiology The quite small differences we observed in cost estimation per patient must be read in conjunction with the number of admissions of these patients in ICUs. For example, on the basis of a recent epidemiological study of septic shock in France [33], finding more than 50 patients yearly admitted for septic shock in each center, our results would be relevant with an approximately 10,000 € annual underestimation per ICU. Concerning hemorrhagic shock, such a dramatic amount would be reached with only four underestimations of this clinical situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ith mortality rates ranging from 15 to 50% (1)(2)(3)(4)(5), severe infections are among the most prevalent causes of death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Therefore, it is of high clinical relevance to establish proper treatment strategies leading to adequate blood concentrations of antibiotics in order to maximize the effectiveness of treatment (6), limit adverse reactions (7), and prevent the development of antimicrobial resistance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%