The epidemiology of renal replacement therapy in two different parts of the world: the Latin American Dialysis and Transplant Registry versus the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry
Abstract:Objective
To compare the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Latin America and Europe, as well as to study differences in macroeconomic indicators, demographic and clinical patient characteristics, mortality rates, and causes of death between these two populations.
Methods
We used data from 20 Latin American and 49 European national and subnational renal registries that had provided data to the Latin American Dialysis an… Show more
“…The number of patients on peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis is 415 patients per million in habitants (pmi) in Peru 5 . Although this is lower than the average in Latin America (660 pmi) 6 . The total of 50.0% of patients with end-stage CKD do not have access to RRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…La progresión natural de la ERC lleva a los pacientes en sus estadios finales al uso de terapia de reemplazo renal (TRR). La cantidad de pacientes en diálisis peritoneal o hemodiálisis es de 415 pacientes por millón de habitantes (pmh) en el Perú 5 , proporción baja en comparación a la media para Latinoamérica (660 pmh) 6 . Es decir, tenemos 50,0% de pacientes con ERC en estadio final que no accede a TRR en relación a otros países de la región.…”
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adherence to a multidisciplinary renal health program in reducing mortality and progression to hemodialysis. METHODS: We used a database that included patient monitoring (2013-2017), dialysis admissions and all cause of mortality in Peru. Adherence to the program was established by meeting minimum visits during the first year of monitoring. The outcome of interest was hemodialysis admissions or all cause-mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-Rank test and competing survival analysis methods were used to estimate the differential risk between adherent and non-adherent patients. RESULTS: A total of 20,354 participants was evaluated; 54.1% were male, 72.1 years old in average, 2.2 years average follow-up, and 15,279 (75.1%) belonged to the early stages (1 to 3a) of Chronic Kidney Disease. Adherence decreased the risk of renal replacement therapy in 41.0% (HR = 0.59, 95%CI 0.41–0.85) in the low-risk group and mortality in the high-risk group was 31.0% (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.57–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary care strategy with standardized assessments by stage is effective in reducing admission to .0when the patient is identified in early stages and in reducing mortality in advanced stages.
“…The number of patients on peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis is 415 patients per million in habitants (pmi) in Peru 5 . Although this is lower than the average in Latin America (660 pmi) 6 . The total of 50.0% of patients with end-stage CKD do not have access to RRT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…La progresión natural de la ERC lleva a los pacientes en sus estadios finales al uso de terapia de reemplazo renal (TRR). La cantidad de pacientes en diálisis peritoneal o hemodiálisis es de 415 pacientes por millón de habitantes (pmh) en el Perú 5 , proporción baja en comparación a la media para Latinoamérica (660 pmh) 6 . Es decir, tenemos 50,0% de pacientes con ERC en estadio final que no accede a TRR en relación a otros países de la región.…”
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adherence to a multidisciplinary renal health program in reducing mortality and progression to hemodialysis. METHODS: We used a database that included patient monitoring (2013-2017), dialysis admissions and all cause of mortality in Peru. Adherence to the program was established by meeting minimum visits during the first year of monitoring. The outcome of interest was hemodialysis admissions or all cause-mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-Rank test and competing survival analysis methods were used to estimate the differential risk between adherent and non-adherent patients. RESULTS: A total of 20,354 participants was evaluated; 54.1% were male, 72.1 years old in average, 2.2 years average follow-up, and 15,279 (75.1%) belonged to the early stages (1 to 3a) of Chronic Kidney Disease. Adherence decreased the risk of renal replacement therapy in 41.0% (HR = 0.59, 95%CI 0.41–0.85) in the low-risk group and mortality in the high-risk group was 31.0% (HR = 0.69, 95%CI 0.57–0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary care strategy with standardized assessments by stage is effective in reducing admission to .0when the patient is identified in early stages and in reducing mortality in advanced stages.
“…This variation in prevalence in part reflects true differences in dialysis use 12 , 15 but also reflects the fact that wealthier countries are more likely than lower income countries to have comprehensive dialysis registries. Of note, the prevalence of haemodialysis is increasing more rapidly in Latin America (at a rate of ~4% per year) than in Europe or the USA (both ~2% per year), although considerable variation between territories exists in all three of these regions, which again correlates primarily (but not exclusively) with wealth 16 , 17 . The prevalence of haemodialysis varies widely across South Asia, with relatively high prevalence (and rapid growth) in India and lower prevalence in Afghanistan and Bangladesh 18 .…”
The development of dialysis by early pioneers such as Willem Kolff and Belding Scribner set in motion several dramatic changes in the epidemiology, economics and ethical frameworks for the treatment of kidney failure. However, despite a rapid expansion in the provision of dialysis — particularly haemodialysis and most notably in high-income countries (HICs) — the rate of true patient-centred innovation has slowed. Current trends are particularly concerning from a global perspective: current costs are not sustainable, even for HICs, and globally, most people who develop kidney failure forego treatment, resulting in millions of deaths every year. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop new approaches and dialysis modalities that are cost-effective, accessible and offer improved patient outcomes. Nephrology researchers are increasingly engaging with patients to determine their priorities for meaningful outcomes that should be used to measure progress. The overarching message from this engagement is that while patients value longevity, reducing symptom burden and achieving maximal functional and social rehabilitation are prioritized more highly. In response, patients, payors, regulators and health-care systems are increasingly demanding improved value, which can only come about through true patient-centred innovation that supports high-quality, high-value care. Substantial efforts are now underway to support requisite transformative changes. These efforts need to be catalysed, promoted and fostered through international collaboration and harmonization.
“…Renal replacement therapy in Argentina has incidence and prevalence rates above the mean for Latin America, most likely because dialysis and transplant are readily available in the country (Table 2). Nevertheless, peritoneal dialysis is relatively less utilized compared to the rest of Latin America [7][8][9] .…”
Section: The National Transplantation Institute (Incucai) Supports a mentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.