2002
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.10031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The epidemiology of mental retardation: Challenges and opportunities in the new millennium

Abstract: There are a number of problems and challenges in relating the science of epidemiology to mental retardation (MR). These relate to how MR is defined and classified and how these definitions may change over time. These as well as other differences in ascertainment sources and methods need to be considered when comparing MR prevalence over time and place. On the other hand, advances in technology also provide new and efficient methods of data collection both by data linkage and by use of web-based methods to stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
388
3
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 537 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
9
388
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of intellectual disability is estimated at B2-3% in the general population and males are more often affected than females. 31 Considering a prevalence of 3%, which is likely to be an overestimation in female population, we found a significantly higher proportion of carriers with cognitive impairment in our series versus in the general population (P ¼ 0.002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…The prevalence of intellectual disability is estimated at B2-3% in the general population and males are more often affected than females. 31 Considering a prevalence of 3%, which is likely to be an overestimation in female population, we found a significantly higher proportion of carriers with cognitive impairment in our series versus in the general population (P ¼ 0.002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…This population ascertainment therefore differs from "administratively" defined populations, as it was through general practitioners/family physicians, not just services provided for persons with intellectual disabilities. Reviewing the existing literature reveals that there are many contributing factors that make the prevalence of intellectual disabilities amongst the adult population far from clear, with it additionally varying with time, country and region, age group, socio-economic factors, and the definition of intellectual disabilities used (Leonard and Wen, 2002),. The population rate of 0.33 per 1,000 is in keeping with other recent population ascertainments/estimates in Europe (Farmer et al 1993;McGrother et al, 2001;van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk HM et al, 2006;Wullink, Van Schrojenstein Lantman de-Valk, Dinant, & Metsemakers, 2007), and is lower than that found amongst children and young persons because of the short life expectancy of persons with intellectual disabilities, combined with their gradual skill development as described above.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The genetic causes of ID have been largely investigated in the past decades, but because of a male prevalence of ID, research was mainly focused on X-linked forms until recently. Molecular karyotyping is the most common technique used today in ID investigation, and gross chromosomal abnormalities explain up to 15% of the cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%