2021
DOI: 10.1111/zph.12865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The epidemiology of bacterial zoonoses in pastoral and dairy cattle in Cameroon, Central Africa

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(64 reference statements)
3
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A copy of the questionnaire and further details on data collection are reported by Kelly et al . (2016, 2021) [ 47 , 48 ]. Age was estimated by dentition score according to the number of permanent incisor teeth present and classified from < 2 years (no permanent incisors) to ≥ 5 years (all incisors in wear/broken).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A copy of the questionnaire and further details on data collection are reported by Kelly et al . (2016, 2021) [ 47 , 48 ]. Age was estimated by dentition score according to the number of permanent incisor teeth present and classified from < 2 years (no permanent incisors) to ≥ 5 years (all incisors in wear/broken).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier reports using the SCITT (13) also showed a higher animal-level prevalence in the NWR (5.58%, 95% CI: 3.89-5.44%) compared to the VIN (2.57%, 95% CI: 1.42-3.72) (58), which is consistent with the current observations. Indeed, related cross-sectional studies show a similar relationship, with prevalence in the NWR (20.95%) being greater than in the VIN (0.55%), although this difference seems extreme compared to the other studies (53)(54)(55)(56). Some of the differences with the current study can be explained by the study design, diagnostic test or cut-off value differenced; therefore, a direct comparison should be made with prudence and care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Statistically, the associations are non-significant for antelope and, although significant for buffalo, the number of cattle in contact were extremely small, which may reflect a false association. However, risk of other zoonotic bacterial infections has been positively associated with wildlife contact, such as Brucella species (53,68). Consequently, it is difficult to interpret the real importance of wildlife contact and M. bovis transmission, with future studies needing to focus on the multiple species to understand transmission dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete dataset for both tests was available for 750 cattle in NWR and 741 cattle in VIN ( n = 748 for IFN-γ assay; n = 741 for SCITT). A detailed summary of animal ( 55 ) and herd-level data ( 29 ) has been previously published. This study utilises the animal-level dataset, accounting for herd and study site in the analysis where appropriate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%