2009
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268809002027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The epidemiology of, and risk factors for, mortality from severe sepsis and septic shock in a tertiary-care university hospital setting

Abstract: This study investigated the clinical characteristics of, and outcomes and risk factors for hospital mortality of 390 patients admitted with severe sepsis or septic shock in an intensive care unit (ICU). Prospectively collected data from patients collected between 1 July 2004 and 30 June 2006 were analysed. Overall hospital mortality was 49.7% and comorbidities were found in 40.3% of patients, the most common of which was haematological malignancy. The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection (50… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
33
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(119 reference statements)
12
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A major proportion of the patients had a positive culture with urinary tract being the predominant site of infection. This is in contrast to other studies [14,15] which have reported lung as the major source of infection. Since ours is a tertiary care hospital, the majority of the patients have a history of prior hospitalization and urinary catheterization, which may be the reason for the present observation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major proportion of the patients had a positive culture with urinary tract being the predominant site of infection. This is in contrast to other studies [14,15] which have reported lung as the major source of infection. Since ours is a tertiary care hospital, the majority of the patients have a history of prior hospitalization and urinary catheterization, which may be the reason for the present observation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…Gram-negative organisms remained the major pathogens in our study which is in accordance with earlier studies [14,15]. Antibiotic resistance is emerging as a serious problem due to inappropriate antibiotic use in both grams negative and gram positive organisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The nosocomial group had a statistically higher incidence of fungal infection (29% vs. 14%) probably due to a higher use of invasive interventions or procedures, total parenteral nutrition or other known risk factors for candida infection [24]. Microbiological distribution is however different from other studies where gram-positive cocci predominated overall [16] and fungi were similar in both categories [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. This difference is likely due to country variability affecting patients' microbial profile on inclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…31 In addition, our fi ndings that older age, failure to achieve resuscitation goals within 6 h of sepsis, lung injury, and APACHE III score were signifi cantly associated with mortality in sepsis is also consistent with prior reports. [32][33][34][35][36] PBEF is believed to play an important role in the development of ALI. Li et al 24 suggested PBEF as a facilitator of pulmonary infl ammation and alveolar epithelial barrier dysfunction via its regulation of other infl ammatory cytokines (eg, IL-8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%