The epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUNDMore than 20 years ago, it was hypothesized that exposure to prenatal and early postnatal environmental xenobiotics with the potential to disrupt endogenous hormone signaling might be on the causal path to cryptorchidism, hypospadias, low sperm count and testicular cancer. Several consensus statements and narrative reviews in recent years have divided the scientific community and have elicited a call for systematic transparent reviews. We aimed to fill this gap in knowledge in the field of male reproductive disorders.OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALEThe aim of this study was to systematically synthesize published data on the risk of cryptorchidism, hypospadias, low sperm counts and testicular cancer following in utero or infant exposure to chemicals that have been included on the European Commission's list of Category 1 endocrine disrupting chemicals defined as having documented adverse effects due to endocrine disruption in at least one intact organism.SEARCH METHODSA systematic literature search for original peer reviewed papers was performed in the databases PubMed and Embase to identify epidemiological studies reporting associations between the outcomes of interest and exposures documented by biochemical analyses of biospecimens including maternal blood or urine, placenta or fat tissue as well as amnion fluid, cord blood or breast milk; this was followed by meta-analysis of quantitative data.OUTCOMESThe literature search resulted in 1314 references among which we identified 33 papers(28 study populations) fulfilling the eligibility criteria. These provided 85 risk estimates of links between persistent organic pollutants and rapidly metabolized compounds (phthalates and Bisphenol A) and male reproductive disorders. The overall odds ratio (OR) across all exposures and outcomes was 1.11 (95% CI 0.91–1.35). When assessing four specific chemical subgroups with sufficient data for meta-analysis for all outcomes, we found that exposure to one of the four compounds, p,p′-DDE, was related to an elevated risk: OR 1.35 (95% CI 1.04–1.74). The data did not indicate that this increased risk was driven by any specific disorder.WIDER IMPLICATIONSThe current epidemiological evidence is compatible with a small increased risk of male reproductive disorders following prenatal and postnatal exposure to some persistent environmental chemicals classified as endocrine disruptors but the evidence is limited. Future epidemiological studies may change the weight of the evidence in either direction. No evidence of distortion due to publication bias was found, but exposure–response relationships are not evident. There are insufficient data on rapidly metabolized endocrine disruptors and on specific exposure–outcome relations. A particular data gap is evident with respect to delayed effects on semen quality and testicular cancer. Although high quality epidemiological studies are still sparse, future systematic and transparent reviews may provide pieces of evidence contributing to the narrative and weight of the evidence assessments in th...

Observations of Isocyanate, Amide, Nitrate, and Nitro Compounds From an Anthropogenic Biomass Burning Event Using a ToF‐CIMS

“…The effects of open fire and firework events on enhancing metalliferous particles (Moreno et al, ), aerosol (Vassura et al, ), and trace gas concentrations (Drewnick et al, ) including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are well documented. Much of the data on gaseous pollutants collected during previous bonfire nights in the UK have focused on persistent organic pollutants (Farrar et al, ; Harrad & Laurie, ), which have been linked to climate change (Nadal et al, ) and are linked to adverse human health effects including cancer (Mouly & Toms, ) and reproductive diseases (Bonde et al, ). Sampling of specific pollutants has mainly been off‐line, using whole air sampling or filter collection, reducing the temporal resolution of the data sets.…”

Mechanisms of Testicular Disruption from Exposure to Bisphenol A and Phtalates

“…Exposure in adults generally seems to be compatible with impaired spermatogenesis and hormone function, but data on this association are limited, complicated by methodological issues and, in part, contradictory. In 2017, a meta-analysis found that the available data did not demonstrate a significant increase in male reproductive alterations following exposure to EDCs [94]. However, the evidence for rapidly metabolized EDCs such as BPA and phthalates was inadequate and most of the epidemiological studies included in the analysis found organochlorides or persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in various body fluids and a clinical correlation with reproductive diseases.…”

Environmental Factors and Male Infertility

“…BPA is ubiquitous, from mineral water bottles, medical devices to food packaging, and has its shadow. This widespread chemical can do great harm to male fertility, having the potential of causing cryptorchidism, hypospadias, low sperm counts, or even testicular cancer [4][5][6]. It was also one of the important causes of occupational infertility [7].…”