2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3611
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ep,i–Eiso correlation: type I gamma-ray bursts and the new classification method

Abstract: We present the most extensive sample of 45 type I (short) and 275 type II (long) gamma-ray bursts (GRB) with known redshift to investigate the correlation between the rest frame peak energy, E p,i and the total isotropic equivalent energy, E iso of the prompt emission (Amati relation). The E p,i -E iso correlation for type I bursts is found to be well-distinguished from the one constructed for type II bursts and has a similar power-law index value, E p,i ∼ E 0.4 iso , which possibly indicates the same emission… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 in Zhang et al 2007b). Additionally, using a completely new GRB sample, including 31 short and 252 long GRBs with wellmeasured peak energy and redshift, Zhang et al (2018a) found that short and long GRBs hold the coincident E p,i − E iso correlations, indicating that both kinds of GRBs may share the same radiation mechanism, which is consistent with the conclusion of Minaev & Pozanenko (2020). Consequently, we assume that Eq.…”
Section: Spectral Characteristics Of Diverse Prompt Emission Segmentssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…2 in Zhang et al 2007b). Additionally, using a completely new GRB sample, including 31 short and 252 long GRBs with wellmeasured peak energy and redshift, Zhang et al (2018a) found that short and long GRBs hold the coincident E p,i − E iso correlations, indicating that both kinds of GRBs may share the same radiation mechanism, which is consistent with the conclusion of Minaev & Pozanenko (2020). Consequently, we assume that Eq.…”
Section: Spectral Characteristics Of Diverse Prompt Emission Segmentssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Swift, and Fermi GRBs (Tarnopolski 2016b; Kwong & Nadarajah 2018;Minaev & Pozanenko 2020). This generally holds in higherdimensional parameter spaces as well (Tarnopolski 2019b,a,c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For GRBs with two or more flares, the sum of these flare energies is considered as the flare energy E flare , which can be obtained by E flare = 4πD 2 L S F /(1 + z), where D L and S F are the luminosity distance and the fluence of X-ray flares, respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding E γ,iso can be obtained from Li Y et al (2016), Ruffini et al (2018), , Tang et al (2019), Fana Dirirsa et al (2019, Minaev & Pozanenko (2020), Hao et al (2020), andDu et al (2021). The X-ray flare data, including the redshift z, the isotropic energy of prompt emission E γ,iso , and the total flare energy E flare , are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%