The Environmental Dimension of the “Brazilian Blue Amazon”: Environmental Rights and Duties on the Continental Shelf

Ventura, Victor Alencar Mayer Feitosa

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50543-1_9

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The interpreters in the field of the law of the sea seek to strengthen the ‘coherence and stability’ of environmental law principles and the current ocean governance structures. 2 While interpreting the law of the sea and making a unique and thought-provoking reference to environmental law, a problem arises that affects how legal interpretation is perceived and ultimately carried out. 3…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 While interpreting the law of the sea and making a unique and thought-provoking reference to environmental law, a problem arises that affects how legal interpretation is perceived and ultimately carried out. 3…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The interpreters in the field of the law of the sea seek to strengthen the 'coherence and stability' of environmental law principles and the current ocean governance structures. 2 While interpreting the law of the sea and making a unique and thought-provoking reference to environmental law, a problem arises that affects how legal interpretation is perceived and ultimately carried out. 3 Through their decision-making tools, the major interpreters involved in prolific implementation increase the debate in legal discourse, which further enhances communication, particularly in disagreement and conflict.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interconnected principles of ocean governance through science-policy integration under the judgements of the international dispute settlement bodies

Zhang,

Butt,

Zulfiqar

2023

Science Progress

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International Dispute Settlement Bodies (IDSBs), through their judgements, have consistently urged the States to take scientific approaches in ocean governance for marine environmental protection. There has been the development of significant jurisprudence which undertake policy principles with scientific prescription in ocean governance. The jurisprudence relating to maritime dispute resolution has primarily relied on the interpretative criteria of ‘integration’ for science and policy as specified in the Vienna Convention. Indeed, this principle of ‘integration’ integrated ‘science-policy’ through various concepts, and IDSBs applied and endorsed the ‘rule of law’, ‘cooperation’, ‘precaution’ and ‘ecosystem-based approach’ to lay stress on the progressive ocean governance. This also reflects that the scientific basis in jurisprudence demonstrates a change in the international organisations’ interests (of environmental protection and global sustainability). Moreover, it is also suggested at the end how the provisions related to Marine Scientific Research can be purposefully developed and maintained to protect the marine environment and ecosystems in light of the decisions of the IDSBs. This research article analysed the relevant jurisprudence to explain the principles for science-policy integration, which operates in ocean governance for marine environmental protection.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%