1992
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.13.5.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Environmental Consequences of Urban Growth: Cross-National Perspectives on Economic Development, Air Pollution, and City Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to other indicators, deforestation has been used to determine environmental impacts. Studies showing the negative impact of deforestation in conjunction with an increase in temperature, extreme weather occurrences, loss of bio-diversity, land erosion, infectious diseases and increasing greenhouse gases emissions are by Shukla and Parikh, 1992;Fearnside, 1992;Dickinson, 2003;Hinderson et al, 1993;Shafiq, 1994;Henderson and Venkatraman, 1993;Zeng et al, 1996;Fearnside, 1997;Laurence, 1999 ;Rustad et al, 2000, respectively. Research on environmental degradation has also focused on the growth-trade liberalization nexus as a primary indicator contributing to climate change. In the same period, environmental economics researchers adopted different hypotheses and estimations to explain the growth-environmental degradation nexus.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to other indicators, deforestation has been used to determine environmental impacts. Studies showing the negative impact of deforestation in conjunction with an increase in temperature, extreme weather occurrences, loss of bio-diversity, land erosion, infectious diseases and increasing greenhouse gases emissions are by Shukla and Parikh, 1992;Fearnside, 1992;Dickinson, 2003;Hinderson et al, 1993;Shafiq, 1994;Henderson and Venkatraman, 1993;Zeng et al, 1996;Fearnside, 1997;Laurence, 1999 ;Rustad et al, 2000, respectively. Research on environmental degradation has also focused on the growth-trade liberalization nexus as a primary indicator contributing to climate change. In the same period, environmental economics researchers adopted different hypotheses and estimations to explain the growth-environmental degradation nexus.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The earlier studies (Grossman and Krueger 1992;Shukla and Parikh 1992;Panayotou 1993;Seldon and Song 1994) have explained the inverted-U path for environmental quality in terms of structural changes in the composition of economic output and increased environmental restrictions at higher levels (Suri and Chapman 1998). In developing countries, some policymakers have interpreted such results as conveying a message about priorities: Grow first, then clean up (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Measurement of spatio-temporal characteristics of urban development is essential for understanding the environmental consequences of anthropogenic resource consumption and landscape change in the context of environment and resource sustainability (Folke, Jansson, Larsson, & Costanza, 1997;Johnson, 2001;Shukla & Parikh, 1992). Long term archives of satellite based observations of anthropogenic night-time brightness provide an efficient way to continuously monitor recent human activity and socioeconomic dynamics during urban processes in a changing world (Croft, 1973;Doll, Muller, & Elvidge, 2000;Elvidge, Baugh, Kihn, Kroehl, & Davis, 1997;Small, Pozzi, & Elvidge, 2005;Sutton, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%