2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac3092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The environment of AGN dwarf galaxies at z ∼ 0.7 from the VIPERS survey

Abstract: Dwarf galaxies are ideal laboratories to study the relationship between the environment and AGN activity. However, the type of environments in which dwarf galaxies hosting AGN reside is still unclear and limited to low-redshift studies ($\rm {z<0.5}$). We use the VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) to investigate, for the first time, their environments at $0.5<\rm {z}<0.9$. We select a sample of 12,942 low-mass ($\rm {log}(M_\mathrm{*}/M_{\odot })\le 10$) galaxies and use t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show the corresponding histograms of the first, third, and tenth closest projected separations in Figure 10 as examples, and the histograms of our active dwarf galaxies do not visually show large differences from those of the comparison sample. Indeed, we found that our sources and the comparison samples do not show statistically significant differences for any of the separations, as also found in Davis et al (2022) and Siudek et al (2023). Therefore, environmental effects are not significantly responsible for the presence of AGNs in dwarf galaxies.…”
Section: Host Environmentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We show the corresponding histograms of the first, third, and tenth closest projected separations in Figure 10 as examples, and the histograms of our active dwarf galaxies do not visually show large differences from those of the comparison sample. Indeed, we found that our sources and the comparison samples do not show statistically significant differences for any of the separations, as also found in Davis et al (2022) and Siudek et al (2023). Therefore, environmental effects are not significantly responsible for the presence of AGNs in dwarf galaxies.…”
Section: Host Environmentssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A larger sample would be needed to confirm such a tendency. We note that a statistical study of the environment of AGN dwarf galaxies out to z ∼ 0.9 was recently performed by Siudek et al (2023), finding that dwarf galaxies prefer lowdensity environments independently of whether they host an AGN or not. This is in agreement with the absence of a significant dependence between AGN activity and environment found for dwarf galaxies at lower redshifts (e.g., Bradford et al 2018;Kristensen et al 2020;Manzano-King & Canalizo 2020;Davis et al 2022).…”
Section: Appendix E Environmentmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Such seed black holes should be found in local dwarf galaxies if they have not grown much through mergers and accretion (Mezcua 2019), where they can be detected as AGN. In the past years several efforts have been made to detect such AGN dwarf galaxies out to z ∼ 1 (Mezcua et al 2018a(Mezcua et al , 2019Halevi et al 2019;Siudek et al 2023); however, the scarce number of high-z sources and for which a black hole mass estimate is available has prevented making a direct connection between them and the early universe seed black holes. In this Letter we have reported the finding of a sample of seven AGN dwarf galaxies out to z ∼ 0.9 and with black hole masses >10 7 M e derived from the width of broad emission lines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Siudek et al (2023) identified a sample of 4315 AGN in dwarf galaxies at 0.5 <z < 0.9, the largest of its kind. The average BH mass of this sample is log M BH = 8.2 M e , derived from correlations between narrow emission lines (Baron & Ménard 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%