2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-013-9533-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
161
1
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
161
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Managing these goals refers to the adherence of family managers to SEW and thus rather non-financial ) firm goals, which secure the survival and longevity of the family firm. For these reasons, capabilities to take risks in business opportunities might not be used to the full extent (Schepers et al 2014), leading to potential financial performance losses. Drawing on the results of this study, we conclude that the degree of family managers' adherence to SEW goals needs to be particularly managed for the effect of Risk-Taking on financial performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Managing these goals refers to the adherence of family managers to SEW and thus rather non-financial ) firm goals, which secure the survival and longevity of the family firm. For these reasons, capabilities to take risks in business opportunities might not be used to the full extent (Schepers et al 2014), leading to potential financial performance losses. Drawing on the results of this study, we conclude that the degree of family managers' adherence to SEW goals needs to be particularly managed for the effect of Risk-Taking on financial performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important as firm performance could also be explained by other influencing factors besides the proposed relationships. Thus, we implemented dummy variables for the industries, in order to control for industry specific performance effects (Schepers et al 2014). Prior research also indicated potential influences of firms size on company outcomes (Kellermanns et al 2012a;Beck et al 2011).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research on the EO-firm performance relationship in the family business context has increased significantly because many researchers see family firms as a unique opportunity to analyze entrepreneurship (Garcés-Galdeano et al 2016;Schepers et al 2014). Their unique characteristics, based on the interaction between family and business goals in decision making, affect how family firms are governed (e.g., in relation to risk behavior and strategic orientation) and have implications for their entrepreneurial attitudes and, ultimately, firm outcomes (Randerson et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as noted by Lumpkin and Dess (1996), there are two main reasons that the relationship between EO and performance is complex. On the one hand, a number of factors, such as strategies, can mediate this relationship (Lumpkin and Dess 1996;Schepers et al 2014;Wiklund and Shepherd 2005). On the other hand, performance is a multi-dimensional concept that tends to become more complex, particularly because firms are increasingly incentivized to consider SD, i.e., non-financial considerations, in their decision making (Battisti and Perry 2011;Perrini et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%