The Entangled Relations of Humans and Nile Crocodiles in Africa, c.1840-1992

Abstract

The nature of European explorers' and hunters' perceptions of the wildlife they encountered during their travels, and how this shaped their responses to it, has been surprisingly little studied. This may in part be because of the wealth of primary material and the dearth of secondary sources. Animal studies has come of age in recent decades, with a focus on how humans have conceptualised and related to animals, but much of this new field concerns domesticated or captive animals and has tended towards philosophical, political and theoretical approaches. Yet there is much to be gained from a historical exploration of the abundant sources on Europeans' encounter with wildlife, notably during the height of colonial exploration and adventuring in Africa. This review focuses on the Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) in Africa. Crocodiles had a major impact on European travellers, elicited extreme reactions and reveal an irrational difference in attitudes to large mammalian predators, as opposed to reptilian. The oftrepeated statement that Nile crocodiles kill more humans and are more hated than any other predator (or even, all other predators) in Africa is still current. The expansion of human settlement and activities into the habitats of crocodiles and increasing demands on water supplies is resulting in escalating conflicts and some experts regard crocodiles as a 'growing threat to rural livelihoods and development'. If these important apex predators of the continent's waterways are to be conserved, then a good place to start seems to be with an exploration of the long history of interactions with them that have shaped expert and public perceptions of crocodile.

Value diversity and conservation conflict: Lessons from the management of red grouse and hen harriers in England

“…Scholars from diverse fields including anthropology, geography, and history have explored connections and interactions between humans and nonhuman animals (DeMello, ). For example, through an anthropological lens, Whitehouse (2009) investigated “the goose problem” on Islay, Scotland; Duffy and Moore () examined the political ecology of human–animal relationships in the context of elephant tourism; and Pooley () interrogated environmental histories of human relations with Nile crocodiles. Inspired by its applied nature, here we focus on human dimensions of wildlife research which aims to evaluate public opinion regarding species and their management in order to inform management decisions (Manfredo, ).…”

The role of risk perception and affect in predicting support for conservation policy under rapid ecosystem change

“…However, lobbying as a strategy to reduce culling can increase conflict between parties, leading to strong opposition which, at its most extreme, can lead to illegal harvesting which in turn can jeopardize conservation effectiveness (Cusack et al, 2020). On Islay and more broadly, management interventions that incorporate elements of the less “rational” human, including factors such as affect, trust, norms, identity and history, into their design may be more effective in securing ongoing engagement (Pooley, 2016; St. John, Steadman, Austen, & Redpath, 2019). In 2019, the United Nations launched the Decade for Ecosystem Restoration (United Nations, 2019), signed by over 70 countries worldwide.…”

IUCN SSC guidelines on human-wildlife conflict and coexistence

“…Cultures emerge from the interactions of humans with the natural and social worlds over time (see Chapter 9, Culture and wildlife), and they change over time (Marvin, 2012;Oommen, 2021;Pooley, 2016). In East Africa, for example, cultural beliefs encourage the tolerance of some dangerous predators such as lions.…”