2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor

Abstract: The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor is a powerful toolset for the analysis, annotation, and prioritization of genomic variants in coding and non-coding regions. It provides access to an extensive collection of genomic annotation, with a variety of interfaces to suit different requirements, and simple options for configuring and extending analysis. It is open source, free to use, and supports full reproducibility of results. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor can simplify and accelerate variant interpretatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
4,107
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,695 publications
(4,403 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
8
4,107
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Copy number profiles were derived with Sequenza 31. Variant annotation was performed with using Annovar 32 or Variant Effect Predictor 33.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copy number profiles were derived with Sequenza 31. Variant annotation was performed with using Annovar 32 or Variant Effect Predictor 33.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensitive pipeline was used to ensure that variants were not missed (a coverage ≥15×, a minimum of two reads for an altered allele, a Phred quality ≥ zero, and no strand bias filter). Variant annotation was carried out with Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) tool from Ensembl 48 and based on the transcripts LDLR : ENTS00000558518, APOB : ENTS00000233242, PCSK9 : ENTS00000302118, and LDLRAP1 : ENTS00000374338. Reported variants were filtered based on their frequency and functional affects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, we made use of the ENSEMBL variant database [18][19][20] as a reference database to map the SNPs with their relevant chromosome, location, gene, allele and potential functional features (intergenic SNPs were mapped to the nearest gene on the chromosome). Additionally, these shared SNPs were interpreted with the characteristics of predicted functional consequences by using RegulomeDB V.1.1 [21] to get annotation from current ENCODE data (updated with recent ENCODE releases: [22,23]), Chromatin States data from the Roadmap Epigenome Consortium and updated data for DNase footprinting, PWMs, and DNA Methylation, and finally ranked the variant lists according to predicted functional consequences attributes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%