2006
DOI: 10.1080/14735970.2006.11419948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Enforcement of Corporate Governance Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dutch code is based on the comply-or-explain principle. Whereas in most European countries the model followed is that of self-regulatory monitoring (Wymeersch 2006), this does not apply to the Netherlands. Reflecting an amendment to an EU Directive, Dutch law requires a listed firm to include a so-called compliance statement in the annual report, in which the firm has to explain its non-compliance with specific recommendations of the Dutch code.…”
Section: Corporate Governance In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Dutch code is based on the comply-or-explain principle. Whereas in most European countries the model followed is that of self-regulatory monitoring (Wymeersch 2006), this does not apply to the Netherlands. Reflecting an amendment to an EU Directive, Dutch law requires a listed firm to include a so-called compliance statement in the annual report, in which the firm has to explain its non-compliance with specific recommendations of the Dutch code.…”
Section: Corporate Governance In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate governance codes (hereafter: codes) are a specific form of soft law (e.g. Thomsen 2006;Wymeersch 2006;Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen & Vihma 2009) that gained in importance for business firms in the past two decades (e.g. Zattoni & Cuomo 2008;Aguilera & Cuervo-Cazurra 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction with the legal system is a complex matter that differs considerably from state to state, both due to differences in the legal status of the codes, but also due to differences in the environing legal system'. 153 Research by sociologists, lawyers, cultural psychologists and economic historians on evolution, path dependency and embeddedness suggests that the relationships between regulatory instruments and causal outcomes cannot adequately be captured by the use of dichotomies. Often-employed dichotomies include the state and the market, 154 markets and hierarchies, 155 public and private 156 or the firm and its environment: 'Such dichotomies construct divisions between two opposing, mutually exclusive categories.…”
Section: March 2009 'New Governance' In European Corporate Law Regulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important because existing theory and practices suggests that the process of providing for more flexible law, such as those provisions introduced by best practice recommendations, fails to control for the distinctively mandatory characteristics of its "comply or explain" features (Wymeersch 2005).…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%