2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy spectra of protons and helium measured with the ATIC experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The essential exception is the measured in the recent ATIC-2 balloon experiment (Panov et al, 2006) helium spectrum, which opposite to the theoretical expectation is noticeably flatter than the protons spectrum. Note that the spectral shape of protons and helium measured in the previous ATIC-1 experiment at energies 10 − 10 4 GeV (Ahn et al, 2006) are very similar. Similar form of the spectra for different GCR nuclei at energies ǫ k = 10 3 − 10 6 GeV if observed could be considered as the indirect confirmation of GCR origin in SNRs.…”
Section: Maximum Energy Of Crssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The essential exception is the measured in the recent ATIC-2 balloon experiment (Panov et al, 2006) helium spectrum, which opposite to the theoretical expectation is noticeably flatter than the protons spectrum. Note that the spectral shape of protons and helium measured in the previous ATIC-1 experiment at energies 10 − 10 4 GeV (Ahn et al, 2006) are very similar. Similar form of the spectra for different GCR nuclei at energies ǫ k = 10 3 − 10 6 GeV if observed could be considered as the indirect confirmation of GCR origin in SNRs.…”
Section: Maximum Energy Of Crssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The ATIC spectrometer has measured both the spectrum and the composition of multi-TeV cosmic rays and found different spectra for the different species. We simulate the 8 species listed with their spectra measured by ATIC (Panov et al 2006;Ahn et al 2006) and fit to an overall offset in the spectral index (∆α) and a flux scale factor (S) where ∆α=0 indicates that the spectrum was measured to be exactly equal to the ATIC spectrum, ∆α >0 indicates a steeper spectrum and ∆α <0 indicates a flatter spectrum. Similarly, S=1 indicates an agreement with the predicted flux, S < 1 indicates that Milagro measures a flux that is less than the the predicted flux and S > 1 indicates a greater flux than predicted.…”
Section: Systematic Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first type is pertinent to the spectrum of the ratio of two different elements attributable to the same or similar accelerators. At least in one such case, the theory has already faced a serious challenge when a ∆q ≈ 0.1 difference be-tween the proton and helium rigidity spectra was firmly established (Ahn et al 2006;Adriani et al 2011;Aguilar et al 2015). Explanations have been given (see Serpico 2015; Malkov 2018 for a review), but only a few of them address the proton and helium spectra at the DSA level (see Hanusch et al 2019 and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%