1994
DOI: 10.1016/0928-7655(94)90001-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
248
0
20

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 505 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
248
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…If the purchaser has incomplete information about the magnitude of the resulting energy savings, the builder or landlord may not be able to recover the cost of such investments, and hence might not undertake them. These market failures with respect to adoption of new technology are part of the explanation for the apparent "paradox" of underinvestment in energy-saving technologies that appear cost-effective but are not widely utilized (Gillingham et al, 2009;Jaffe and Stavins, 1994;Newell et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Economics Of Technological Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the purchaser has incomplete information about the magnitude of the resulting energy savings, the builder or landlord may not be able to recover the cost of such investments, and hence might not undertake them. These market failures with respect to adoption of new technology are part of the explanation for the apparent "paradox" of underinvestment in energy-saving technologies that appear cost-effective but are not widely utilized (Gillingham et al, 2009;Jaffe and Stavins, 1994;Newell et al, 2004).…”
Section: The Economics Of Technological Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jaffe and Stavins 1994), theoretical studies argue that long-term incentives to adopt environmentally friendly technologies are stronger under market-based instruments (e.g. subsidies, taxes) than they are under command-and-control instruments (see e.g.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Jaffe and Stavins (1994) refer to this as the paradox of the energy-efficiency gap. It lies at the heart of the contradictory bottom-up versus top-down estimates of effectiveness of policies to improve energy efficiency.…”
Section: Nonconstant Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%