1934
DOI: 10.1093/jn/8.5.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Energy Metabolism of the Albino Rat in Relation to the Plane of Nutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
1

Year Published

1955
1955
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies on mammals and birds employ meal sizes that constitute substantially less than 5% of the animal's body mass and it is reasonable to expect lower scope values in these cases (McCue, 2006;Secor, 2009). However, even in the several studies where mammals were fed meals constituting >5% of body mass, scope values still ranged between 1.36 and 2.02, considerably lower than the scopes observed in this study (Atkinson and Lusk, 1919;Benedict and Pratt, 1913;Campbell et al, 2000;Costa and Kooyman, 1984;Curcio et al, 1999;Forbes et al, 1934;Hindle et al, 2003;Kriss, 1938;Weiss and Rapport, 1924;Williams et al, 1912). Because the peak of the SDA response is typically greater when digesting protein-rich meals compared with equicaloric lipidor carbohydrate-rich meals (McCue, 2006;Secor, 2009), it is possible the highly protein-rich shrimp diet offered to our bats is, in part, responsible for the greater scope values seen, relative to other mammalian studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Many studies on mammals and birds employ meal sizes that constitute substantially less than 5% of the animal's body mass and it is reasonable to expect lower scope values in these cases (McCue, 2006;Secor, 2009). However, even in the several studies where mammals were fed meals constituting >5% of body mass, scope values still ranged between 1.36 and 2.02, considerably lower than the scopes observed in this study (Atkinson and Lusk, 1919;Benedict and Pratt, 1913;Campbell et al, 2000;Costa and Kooyman, 1984;Curcio et al, 1999;Forbes et al, 1934;Hindle et al, 2003;Kriss, 1938;Weiss and Rapport, 1924;Williams et al, 1912). Because the peak of the SDA response is typically greater when digesting protein-rich meals compared with equicaloric lipidor carbohydrate-rich meals (McCue, 2006;Secor, 2009), it is possible the highly protein-rich shrimp diet offered to our bats is, in part, responsible for the greater scope values seen, relative to other mammalian studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This has not been observed; nor is there a reduction in scatter of energy expenditure at the upper end of the body weight range. On the other hand, most of the rats were of approximately equal length which, rather than weight, would be the Forbes et al (1934) and Kriss et al (1934) Kriss et al (1934) according to the proximate principle composition of diet 41. The diurnal rhythm in total metabolism is a composite ofincreased nocturnal activity and a nocturnal feeding habit, with the energy costs of activity and of S.D.A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…estimated from re-feeding of fasted animals without correction for the metabolism of body tissue. Forbes et al (1934) and Kriss et al (1934) 100 g rats fed at various levels of food intake, rises with food intake unless the total catabolized substance is taken into account, that is the catabolized body substance of animals receiving submaintenance diets. The present estimate of S.D.A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to changes in the caloric density of their diets, rats increase or decrease their food intake so as to maintain a stable body weight [Adolph, 19471. The role of energy expenditure in defense of body weight was initially , with permission of the author and publisher.) inferred from observations that weight changes during food restriction or force-feeding were less than expected from the imposed caloric deficits or excesses [Bjorntorp and Yang, 1982;Boyle et al, 1978;Forbes et al, 1930;Hamilton, 1969;Kriss et al, 1934;Levitsky et al, 1976;Ozelci et al, 19781. More recently, changes in energy expenditure following alterations in body weight have been measured directly.…”
Section: Active Defense Of Body Weight In Normal Weight Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%