2003
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The energy cost of song in the canary, Serinus canaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the actual costs of singing loudly still remain to be uncovered (Gil and Gahr 2002). The current picture suggests that energy expenditure plays only a very minor role (Oberweger and Goller 2001;Franz and Goller 2003;Ward et al 2003Ward et al , 2004. Most likely, the production of loud songs is primarily constrained by predation and/or social aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the actual costs of singing loudly still remain to be uncovered (Gil and Gahr 2002). The current picture suggests that energy expenditure plays only a very minor role (Oberweger and Goller 2001;Franz and Goller 2003;Ward et al 2003Ward et al , 2004. Most likely, the production of loud songs is primarily constrained by predation and/or social aggression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although song production is assumed to be costly, in general singing does not appear to be so for most birds (e.g. Ward et al 2003), and, thus, females may not trade-off song and egg production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, a truncated breeding season would result in increased testosterone, which in turn would require increased glucocorticoids to meet energetic demands associated with calling. This model may be less applicable to birds, as the relative energetic demands of vocalization are much higher for amphibians (frogs) than for birds (Emerson 2001;Ward et al 2003). Another possibility is that we do not see a positive relationship between testosterone and corticosterone in birds because testosterone is much more sensitive to social interactions and thus more variable at any given sampling time in birds than in amphibians and reptiles.…”
Section: Geographic Variation In Hormones 651mentioning
confidence: 93%