2008
DOI: 10.1126/science.1155504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Energetic Cost of Climbing in Primates

Abstract: Primates are exceptional among mammals for their climbing abilities and arboreal lifestyles. Here we show that small primates (less than 0.5 kilogram) consume the same amount of mass-specific energy (COTTOT) whether climbing or walking a given distance. COTTOT decreases with increasing body size for walking but does not change for climbing. This divergence of COTTOT is likely due to fundamental differences in the biomechanical determinants of the costs of climbing versus walking. These results have important i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hanna et al (31) have found that climbing efficiency is invariant across a wide range of body sizes and morphologies in primates, and therefore these joint movements of extreme dorsiflexion and inversion are likely critical adaptations for safe climbing rather than for energetically efficient climbing. Pontzer and Wrangham (32) have also suggested that climbing adaptations in chimpanzees are related to safety rather than energetic costs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hanna et al (31) have found that climbing efficiency is invariant across a wide range of body sizes and morphologies in primates, and therefore these joint movements of extreme dorsiflexion and inversion are likely critical adaptations for safe climbing rather than for energetically efficient climbing. Pontzer and Wrangham (32) have also suggested that climbing adaptations in chimpanzees are related to safety rather than energetic costs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it seems justified to assume that an increased percentage of adipose depots, without a parallel increase in the size of the musculoskeletal system, significantly decreases maximum running speeds also in animals. Recently, Hanna and colleagues 67 have shown that vertical climbing efficiency increases only very slightly with body mass in primates (exponent of 0.11, not significantly different from zero), i.e. the cost of travel during climbing is almost directly proportional to body mass.…”
Section: Costs Of Transporting Adipose Depotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor et al, 1972;Wunder and Morrison, 1974) and there has been no predictable relationship between cost, incline angle and body size (Full and Tullis, 1990). However, in primates, the sister group to colugos, the cost of climbing is independent of body mass (Hanna et al, 2008). Further work into the metabolic cost of climbing across diverse taxa is required to fully understand this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%