The human brain stands out among mammals by being unusually large. The expensive-tissue hypothesis explains its evolution by proposing a trade-off between the size of the brain and that of the digestive tract, which is smaller than expected for a primate of our body size. Although this hypothesis is widely accepted, empirical support so far has been equivocal. Here we test it in a sample of 100 mammalian species, including 23 primates, by analysing brain size and organ mass data. We found that, controlling for fat-free body mass, brain size is not negatively correlated with the mass of the digestive tract or any other expensive organ, thus refuting the expensive-tissue hypothesis. Nonetheless, consistent with the existence of energy trade-offs with brain size, we find that the size of brains and adipose depots are negatively correlated in mammals, indicating that encephalization and fat storage are compensatory strategies to buffer against starvation. However, these two strategies can be combined if fat storage does not unduly hamper locomotor efficiency. We propose that human encephalization was made possible by a combination of stabilization of energy inputs and a redirection of energy from locomotion, growth and reproduction. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10629Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-57326 Accepted Version Originally published at: Navarrete, A; van Schaik, C P; Isler, K (2011). Energetics and the evolution of human brain size. Nature, 480 (7375) across a broad array of taxa was urgently needed, but has so far not been conducted due to lack of 37 morphological data, nor has there been an examination of the broader trade-offs amongst other 38 expensive organs predicted by an extension of this hypothesis 7 .
39Here, we examine the presence of correlated evolution of organ sizes in a new dataset of the 40 mass of various visceral organs (heart, lungs, stomach, intestines, kidneys, spleen and liver) and 41 associated brain size for 100 mammal species, including 23 primate species (see Suppl. Data).
42Dissections followed a strict protocol and were all conducted by one of the authors (A.N.). We
45In this analysis, it is crucial to control for body size. The usual measure taken for this, body 46 mass, is highly affected by variation in the size of adipose depots, which may confound or even 47 reverse the direction of correlations among organs (Suppl. Fig. 2, Suppl. Table 4b). Here, we 48 therefore used fat-free body mass as the best proxy for body size. All analyses took phylogenetic 49 relatedness into account (Suppl. Fig. 3). The sample size of 100 species yields a power of 0.8 for 50 these analyses, which was determined a priori using a published dataset of 39 mammal species (see 51 Methods).
52Contrary to the predictions of the Expensive Tissue Hypothesis, we found no negative 53 correlations between the relative size of the brain and the digestive tract, other expensive organs or 54 their combined sum among mamm...