2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02339-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enemy release hypothesis and Callosciurus erythraeus in Argentina: combining community and biogeographical parasitological studies

Abstract: The enemy release hypothesis (ERH) postulates that during the invasion process an introduced species is released from the natural enemies that regulate its populations, promoting its invasion success in the new environment. Callosciurus erythraeus is a sciurid native to Southeast Asia that has been successfully introduced into Argentina and other Asian and European countries. The aim of this study was to provide new parasitological data on this species and to compare it with studies in native and other introdu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was observed mainly in populations in Japan, where the helminth Strongyloides callosciureus was successfully co-introduced with its original host [133,134] while other Callosciurus-specific nematodes, Brevistriata callosciuri and Gongylonema neoplasticum, were detected in only one to three hosts [134][135][136]. In Argentina, France, Belgium and Italy, the introduction of Callosciurus-specific parasites was detected to a very low extent, possibly resulting in extinction of the parasite in the future [130,131,[137][138][139]. Consequently, in these countries, there is a very low risk of macroparasite spillover from the alien to native rodent species.…”
Section: Macroparasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was observed mainly in populations in Japan, where the helminth Strongyloides callosciureus was successfully co-introduced with its original host [133,134] while other Callosciurus-specific nematodes, Brevistriata callosciuri and Gongylonema neoplasticum, were detected in only one to three hosts [134][135][136]. In Argentina, France, Belgium and Italy, the introduction of Callosciurus-specific parasites was detected to a very low extent, possibly resulting in extinction of the parasite in the future [130,131,[137][138][139]. Consequently, in these countries, there is a very low risk of macroparasite spillover from the alien to native rodent species.…”
Section: Macroparasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in these countries, there is a very low risk of macroparasite spillover from the alien to native rodent species. Since, so far, Pallas's squirrels are only accidentally parasitized by nematodes acquired in their new environment (Table 2), the risk of parasite spillback also seems to be very low (France and Belgium [137], Italy [131] and Argentina [138,139]).…”
Section: Macroparasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the most predominant and intuitive, the enemy release hypothesis posits that nonindigenous species are released from the pressure of predators and parasites once introduced to their exotic ranges (Elton, 1958 ; Keane & Crawley, 2002 ). Introduced species might have advantages over resident species against native enemies by, for example, not being recognized as prey or hosts for parasites in the exotic range (e.g., Cottrell & Shapiro‐Ilan, 2003 ; Gozzi et al., 2020 ; Montes et al., 2020 ; Tierney et al., 2020 ). However, Elton ( 1958 ) mentions that species leaving coevolved predators and parasites from the native areas immediately meet novel potential enemies once introduced in the exotic range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the enemy release hypothesis as a driving force behind successful invasions should be tested for already established invasive species that are in their spreading phase (i.e., abundant or dominant) in the exotic range. Furthermore, studies investigating the role of enemy release as a causal mechanism of invasiveness are mainly based on invasive plant and vertebrate species (e.g., Carpenter & Cappuccino, 2005 ; Gozzi et al., 2020 ; Hawkes, 2007 ; Hierro et al., 2005 ; van Kleunen et al., 2010 ; Lankau et al., 2004 ; Liu & Stiling, 2006 ; Meijer et al., 2016 ; Montes et al., 2020 ; Schultheis et al., 2015 ; Tierney et al., 2020 ), whereas only a limited number is focused on arthropods (e.g., Aliabadi & Juliano, 2002 ; Juliano et al., 2010 ; Paula et al., 2021 ; Zuharah & Lester, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation