2014
DOI: 10.1057/jird.2014.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enduring relevance of Rosa Luxemburg’s The Accumulation of Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Colombian case, the concept is useful to understand the 'forcible usurpation' of common property and subsequent acts of enclosures firstly by means of violence, predominantly by private and corporate interests, and later through law (Marx 1967, p. 724). The role of violence in this process is best theorized by Rosa Luxemburg, who argues that militarism serves a dual function of displacing peasant economies (accumulation by dispossession) and producing new markets for production and consumption of, for example, weapons and infrastructure for executing military endeavours (Luxemburg, 1988; see also Bieler et al, 2016;Schmidt, 2010).…”
Section: The Political Economy Of Militaristic Neoliberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Colombian case, the concept is useful to understand the 'forcible usurpation' of common property and subsequent acts of enclosures firstly by means of violence, predominantly by private and corporate interests, and later through law (Marx 1967, p. 724). The role of violence in this process is best theorized by Rosa Luxemburg, who argues that militarism serves a dual function of displacing peasant economies (accumulation by dispossession) and producing new markets for production and consumption of, for example, weapons and infrastructure for executing military endeavours (Luxemburg, 1988; see also Bieler et al, 2016;Schmidt, 2010).…”
Section: The Political Economy Of Militaristic Neoliberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons behind such conceptualisations are three-fold. (1) The narrow understanding of class formation and struggle which discounts the historically specific subjugation of nonwage, unpaid, reproductive, precarious, migrant and informal forms of labour to the capitalist value form and neglects the presence of labour and its 'lived' and 'perceived experience' in diverse modes (Barna et al, 2017;Bieler et al, 2016;Erdo gdu, 2018;Featherstone and Griffin, 2016;Hofmeester and Van der Linden, 2018;Luxemburg 2003Luxemburg [1913Wood, 2016Wood, [1982). (2) The conception of state as a separate entity from social relations which disregards the state-capital-class connections in the reproduction of capitalist domination and its repressive forms in times of crisis (cf Smith, 2015).…”
Section: Progressive Politicisation As Conjoined Struggles Against Camentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Rosa Luxemburg’s life and work has received only a small amount of recent attention in IR (Bieler et al, 2016; Worth, 2012), it is relevant to ask why she might be a person worth investigating. Her thought is potentially worth investigating for three reasons.…”
Section: Why Luxemburg?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In considering this problem Bieler et al (2016) argue that while some aspects of Luxemburg’s thought, such as viewing capitalism diffusing from Europe might place her in a Eurocentric mould, her depiction of the non-capitalist world and militarism do not. It is correct to note that Luxemburg continuously stressed the destruction wrought by imperialism and capitalism.…”
Section: Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%