2007
DOI: 10.1002/nur.20165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The enduring and contextual effects of physical health and depression on care‐dyad mutuality

Abstract: Mutuality is a protective factor in family care situations, but little is known about changes in care-dyad mutuality. In this study, we examined mutuality in 103 care dyads over 20 months, and the enduring and contextual impact of older adult and family caregiver health on changes in mutuality. Care dyads consisted of frail older adults and their family caregiver. Older adults reported higher levels of mutuality than family caregivers, but their mutuality declined significantly faster over time. Although chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(69 reference statements)
4
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of such models for the examination of dyadic data and time-varying covariates have been well described. 34,35 Three longitudinal dyad models were tested for each QOL domain (ie, physical, psychological, social, and environmental) using Hierarchical Linear Modeling v7 (Skokie, IL). 36 The first model was an unconditional (ie, no covariates included) linear model of QOL within dyads over time, which estimates the population averages of QOL for both survivors and caregivers (fixed effects), the interdependence between QOL of members of the survivor-caregiver dyad (tau correlations), and the variability around average trajectories of QOL for both members (random effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of such models for the examination of dyadic data and time-varying covariates have been well described. 34,35 Three longitudinal dyad models were tested for each QOL domain (ie, physical, psychological, social, and environmental) using Hierarchical Linear Modeling v7 (Skokie, IL). 36 The first model was an unconditional (ie, no covariates included) linear model of QOL within dyads over time, which estimates the population averages of QOL for both survivors and caregivers (fixed effects), the interdependence between QOL of members of the survivor-caregiver dyad (tau correlations), and the variability around average trajectories of QOL for both members (random effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 5-point response format is used, ranging from 0 = not at all to 4 = a great deal. The relationship between worsening health and declining mutuality with a family caregiver in older adults over 20 months provides evidence for construct validity of the original Mutuality Scale and highlights its relevance for this study of cancer survivors (Lyons, Sayer, Archbold, Hornbrook, & Stewart, 2007). In previous caregiving research with Caucasians and African Americans, Cronbach's alpha was .90 to .95.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In dementia care dyads, studies have evaluated such cross-partner dyadic outcomes as mutuality (Archbold, Stewart, Greenlick, & Harvath, 1990;Lyons, Sayer, Archbold, Hornbrook, & Stewart, 2007) and communality (Williamson, Shaffer, & Schulz, 1998) in the relationship. Each of these concepts is relationship-oriented and would be susceptible to contributions both from within the individual and from the partner.…”
Section: Classifying Outcomes Related To Dementia Caregivers' Stress mentioning
confidence: 99%