1983
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788700027002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The endomorphism ring of a locally free module

Abstract: We identify a large class of rings over which locally free modules are determined by their endomorphism rings. We characterize these endomorphism rings and consider under what circumstances the conditions on the locally free modules can be relaxed, for example by requiring that only one of the rings need be in the special class, or by replacing "free' by "projective".

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If (F, A) contains a point, and e is an associated idempotent, the bimodule (F, A, E) is isomorphic to the bimodule (eEe, eE, E) in the sense that: (1) there is a semi-linear isomorphism (p, y) of the left modules (F, A) and (eEe, eE). (2) y is an E-isomorphism of the right modules (A, E) and (eE, E).…”
Section: Definition and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If (F, A) contains a point, and e is an associated idempotent, the bimodule (F, A, E) is isomorphic to the bimodule (eEe, eE, E) in the sense that: (1) there is a semi-linear isomorphism (p, y) of the left modules (F, A) and (eEe, eE). (2) y is an E-isomorphism of the right modules (A, E) and (eE, E).…”
Section: Definition and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its proof is implicit in section 4 of [2]. See also [ Conversely, for any point of A, let e be an associated idempotent.…”
Section: Definition and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the fact that Ae i is a finite direct sum of indecomposable modules, by the finiteness condition on e i , implies that the same happens to R. REMARK 4.4. In [3], a ring R is said to be an /F-ring when every nonzero summand of a free .R-module is indecomposable if and only if it is isomorphic to R R. Corollary 4.3 can be obviously applied to /F-rings: if R is such, then one can choose the family {e tJ } in the natural manner of the proof of Theorem 4.2, and then F is the finite topology on A = End( R F), A Q contains all the finite idempotents and each e t is primitive. Thus it is easy to obtain from this [13, Theorem 3.1], for if the conditions therein hold, then the direct sum ® 7 .Ee, (in the notation of [13]) may be written as © EUj for primitive idempotents M and hence one can see that (b) PROOF.…”
Section: « = E/«*--•mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Wolfson [20] in the 50s; and by Metelli and Salce [14] and Liebert [11,12,13] in the 70s. A more general result in this connection was obtained by Franzsen and Schultz [3,Theorem 3.2] in 1983: they provide a solution to the Characterization Problem for the class J[ of all the (locally) free i?-modules over rings R which satisfy the condition that each nonzero summand of a (locally) free .R-module is indecomposable if and only if it is isomorphic to R R. [2] Endomorphism rings 117…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%