2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201218826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The end of super AGB and massive AGB stars

Abstract: Context. The literature is rich in analysis and results related to thermally pulsing-asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) stars, but the problem of the instabilities that arise and cause the divergence of models during the late stages of their evolution is rarely addressed. Aims. We investigate the physical conditions, causes and consequences of the interruption in the calculations of massive AGB stars in the late thermally-pulsing AGB phase. Methods. We have thoroughly analysed the physical structure of a solar m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
73
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(51 reference statements)
6
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The proximity of the guest star to the Crab Nebula (M 1 or NGC 1952) was first pointed out by Lundmark (1921). The expansion of the Crab Nebula, which was discovered by Lampland (1921) and Duncan (1921), is consistent with the explosion occurring in 1054 (Hubble 1928;Rudie et al 2008, but see also Trimble 1968;Wyckoff & Murray 1977;Nugent 1998).…”
Section: Sn 1054 (Crab Nebula)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The proximity of the guest star to the Crab Nebula (M 1 or NGC 1952) was first pointed out by Lundmark (1921). The expansion of the Crab Nebula, which was discovered by Lampland (1921) and Duncan (1921), is consistent with the explosion occurring in 1054 (Hubble 1928;Rudie et al 2008, but see also Trimble 1968;Wyckoff & Murray 1977;Nugent 1998).…”
Section: Sn 1054 (Crab Nebula)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…All intermediate-mass stars experienced convergence problems of the type discussed by Lau et al (2012) and the models terminated with reasonably large envelope masses (≈ 1M ⊙ ). This means that the lifetimes given in Tables 1 and 2 are lower limits although in we estimated that one or two missed TPs is not going to affect the total stellar lifetimes or AGB lifetimes of models with M 2.4M ⊙ .…”
Section: The C/o Ratiomentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The values of M fin env in the case of the Z = 0.02 models are still relatively high due to convergence issues at the end of the calculations (Lau et al 2012). Due to the high mass-loss rate at this point of the evolution, only one or two more TPs are possible before the envelope is lost and it is uncertain if any more TDUs would occur following these TPs.…”
Section: The Stellar Structure Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%